NETWORK CAPABILITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY FROM THE OPEN INNOVATION VIEW

被引:0
|
作者
Ge, Hufei [1 ]
Tong, YunHuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Innovat & Entrepreneurship, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
Inter-organizational ambidexterity; Intra-organizational ambidexterity; Network capability; Open innovation; EXPLORATION; EXPLOITATION; PERFORMANCE; ANTECEDENTS; MANAGEMENT; CONSEQUENCES; DILEMMA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Organizational ambidexterity has become an emerging research trend when it adapt to the environment dynamism in the organization science and strategy research. Previous research focused on the organization-level or unit-level analysis like structural, context and TMT attributes within the organizational boundary, especially focused on the MNCs. However, small and medium firms also need to balance the exploration and exploitation to adapt to the environment dynamism with limited resource engagement in the context of China that the distribution of organizational technology and market resource is uneven. From the open innovation research advancement, inter-organizational ambidexterity that organizations balance the exploration and exploitation simultaneously across the organizational boundary through the co-specialization is more realistic pattern. Through the analysis of interaction of the inter-organizational and intra-organizational ambidexterity, we introduce network capability as the antecedent in the network context and suggest an integrated model.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 163
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Rethinking Open Innovation from Resources Based View and Dynamic Capability Perspective: Determinants and Its Consequences
    Rihayana, I. Gede
    Supartha, Wayan Gde
    Sintaasih, Desak Ketut
    Surya, Ida Bagus Ketut
    [J]. QUALITY-ACCESS TO SUCCESS, 2023, 24 (192): : 148 - 153
  • [32] Investigating the Role of Leadership and Organizational Culture in Fostering Innovation Ambidexterity
    Lin, Hsing-Er
    McDonough, Edward F., III
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2011, 58 (03) : 497 - 509
  • [33] How incentive synergy and organizational structures shape innovation ambidexterity
    Zhang, Qingqiang
    Sun, Xinbo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 27 (01) : 156 - 177
  • [34] A Framework for Positioning and Assessing Innovation Capability from an Organizational Perspective
    Rodriguez, Lilibeth
    Diaz, Jessica
    Garbajosa, Juan
    Perez, Jennifer
    Yaguee, Agustin
    [J]. 2014 47TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2014, : 3564 - 3573
  • [35] Organizational Ambidexterity and Innovation Performance: The Moderating Effect of Entrepreneurial Orientation
    Bai, Jingkun
    Ren, Jimei
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF BUSINESS RESEARCH IN CHINA, 2016, 10 (04) : 664 - 693
  • [36] The Role of Organizational Capability on Technological Innovation
    Xu, Rui
    Song, Xiaomin
    Liu, Guoxin
    [J]. 2008 ISECS INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION, CONTROL, AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 3, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 339 - 343
  • [37] Innovation capability and organizational resources configuration
    Bravo-Ibarra, Edna R.
    Herrera, Liliana
    [J]. INTANGIBLE CAPITAL, 2009, 5 (03) : 301 - 320
  • [38] Toward an integrated framework of corporate venturing for organizational ambidexterity as a dynamic capability
    Weiss, Lysander
    Kanbach, Dominik K.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT REVIEW QUARTERLY, 2022, 72 (04) : 1129 - 1170
  • [39] Knowledge network capability and organizational innovation: Network position transition and ambidextrous innovative behaviors as mediators
    Tong, Xing
    Han, Xiaomeng
    [J]. SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2021, 49 (09):
  • [40] Managing open innovation with scientific and business partners: the mediating role of organizational practices and collaborative mindset in fostering ambidexterity
    Lazzarotti, Valentina
    Manzini, Raffaella
    Nosella, Anna
    Pellegrini, Luisa
    [J]. IFKAD 2014: 9TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS: KNOWLEDGE AND MANAGEMENT MODELS FOR SUSTAINABLE GROWTH, 2014, : 2500 - 2515