Social capital and entrepreneurial intention: empirical evidence from rural community of Pakistan

被引:35
|
作者
Ali, Amjad [1 ]
Yousuf, Sania [2 ]
机构
[1] Karakoram Int Univ, Dept Dev Studies, Hunza Campus, Gilgit Baltistan, Pakistan
[2] Karakoram Int Univ, Dept Econ, Gilgit Batistan, Pakistan
关键词
Rural community; Local economic development; Entrepreneurial behavior; VENTURE CREATION; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1186/s40497-019-0193-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Understanding the antecedents of the entrepreneurial intentions is vital in development of entrepreneurship in a region. Entrepreneurship is considered as one of the important elements of local economic development which can be used to address the issues of poverty and scarcity of livelihood opportunities in rural areas of the world. This study investigates the influence of social capital on entrepreneurial intentions in rural area of Pakistan. For this purpose, a representative sample of 325 respondents has been selected from rural community in Gilgit-Baltistan. The constructed model has been estimated using the partial least square method and the results show that social capital has significant positive impact on entrepreneurial intentions by forming perceived desirability, perceived self-efficacy, and perceived social norms towards entrepreneurship. This study recommends rural community of Pakistan should be given awareness about the potential of entrepreneurship opportunities and such awareness programs have unique advantages to various segments of rural community. Women, unemployed individuals, and younger generations in particular may get the maximum benefits as people in mountainous regions have already limited earning options. In such a case, developing entrepreneurial intentions of the mountain community in Gilgit-Baltistan leads to understandings of benefits of initiating their own ventures, get economic advantages, and contribute to households' income.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Parental benefits from intergenerational coresidence: Empirical evidence from rural Pakistan
    Kochar, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2000, 108 (06) : 1184 - 1209
  • [32] The impact of social capital on entrepreneurial intention and its antecedents: Differences between social capital online and offline
    Perez Fernandez, Hector
    Rodriguez Escudero, Ana Isabel
    Martin Cruz, Natalia
    Delgado Garcia, Juan Bautista
    [J]. BRQ-BUSINESS RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2021,
  • [33] The Impact of Social Intelligence and Sense of Humor on Entrepreneurial Intention: Evidence from Turkey
    Aykol, Sinem
    Yener, Mujdelen
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INNOVATION, 2009, : 20 - 26
  • [34] Academic Entrepreneurial Support, Social Capital, and Green Entrepreneurial Intention: Does Psychological Capital Matter for Young Saudi Graduates?
    Ghodbane, Adel
    Alwehabie, Abdullah
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (15)
  • [35] Social capital and windfalls: Empirical evidence
    Georgellis, Yannis
    Sessions, John G.
    Tsitsianis, Nikolaos
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2008, 99 (03) : 521 - 525
  • [36] Social capital and energy poverty: Empirical evidence from China
    Ren, Zhiyuan
    Zhu, Yuhan
    Jin, Canyang
    Xu, Aiting
    [J]. ENERGY, 2023, 267
  • [37] Influencing Mechanism of Rural Households' Livelihood Capital on Entrepreneurial Behavior: Evidence from the CFPS
    Wang, Fang
    Mao, Jingyi
    Liu, Yafu
    Cai, Qihua
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (09):
  • [38] The Prediction of Entrepreneurial Alertness Among Rural Cooperatives Based on Social Capital and Entrepreneurial Passion
    Aliabadi, Vahid
    Ataei, Pouria
    Gholamrezai, Saeed
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [39] Social Capital and Entrepreneurial Outcomes: Evidence from Informal Sector Entrepreneurs in Ethiopia
    Kebede, Getahun Fenta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2018, 27 (02): : 209 - 242
  • [40] Social cohesion, neoliberalism, and the entrepreneurial community in rural Saskatchewan
    Jaffe, JoAnn
    Quark, Amy A.
    [J]. AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2006, 50 (02) : 206 - 225