What is the best site for embryo deposition? A systematic review and meta-analysis using direct and adjusted indirect comparisons

被引:23
|
作者
Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
机构
[1] Giza
关键词
embryo transfer; endometrial cavity length; IVF; meta-analysis; pregnancy rates;
D O I
10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61054-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The site of embryo replacement has been postulated as being important to the success of IVF/ICSI. In order to determine the best site for embryo deposition during embryo transfer, a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing different uterine deposition sites was undertaken. Electronic (e.g. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, LILACS) and hand searches were performed to locate trials. Outcomes measures were the live-birth (LBR), ongoing pregnancy (OPR), and clinical pregnancy rates (CPR). Assessments of the endometrial cavity length (ECL) and the distance from the fundus to the tip of the catheter (DTC) were utilized. Six studies were identified, of which three were excluded. Meta-analysis was conducted with the Mantel-Haenszel method, utilizing the fixed-effects model. The LBR and OPR showed an increasing trend when transfers were performed to the lower half of the uterine cavity. For the DTC, all rates were significantly higher for the similar to 20 mm versus similar to 10 mm distance from the uterine fundus, supporting the results of the ECL analysis. The results of this systematic review show that there is limited evidence of the superiority of lower cavity transfers (e.g. similar to 20 mm) compared with the traditional high cavity (e.g. similar to 10 mm) transfers. More well-designed and powered randomized trials are needed to confirm this conclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 619
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The indirect costs of multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stawowczyk, Ewa
    Malinowski, Krzysztof Piotr
    Kawalec, Pawel
    Mocko, Pawel
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2015, 15 (05) : 759 - 786
  • [32] What exercise strategies are best for people with cognitive impairment and dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Zecheng
    Guo, Hongpeng
    Liu, Xuebin
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2024, 124
  • [33] The indirect costs of ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Malinowski, Krzysztof Piotr
    Kawalec, Pawel
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2015, 15 (02) : 285 - 300
  • [34] Factors associated with embryo mosaicism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    A Cascales
    R Morales
    A Castro
    JA Ortiz
    B Lledo
    J Ten
    A Bernabeu
    R Bernabeu
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2023, 40 : 2317 - 2324
  • [35] Effects of Phloroglucinol on Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cai, Rui
    Lin, Jinli
    Liu, Yao
    Zhang, Linhao
    Li, Xueying
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2024, 89 (05) : 376 - 386
  • [36] Factors associated with embryo mosaicism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cascales, A.
    Morales, R.
    Castro, A.
    Ortiz, J. A.
    Lledo, B.
    Ten, J.
    Bernabeu, A.
    Bernabeu, R.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2023, 40 (10) : 2317 - 2324
  • [37] Hidradenitis suppurativa and metabolic syndrome - systematic review and adjusted meta-analysis
    Phan, Kevin
    Charlton, Olivia
    Smith, Saxon D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 58 (10) : 1112 - 1117
  • [38] Atypical antipsychotic medications in the treatment of schizophrenia: A Bayesian meta-analysis of direct and indirect comparisons
    Mahmood, M. H.
    Malone, D. C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (03) : A110 - A110
  • [39] Systematic review with meta-analysis: direct comparisons of biomarkers for the diagnosis of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C and B
    Houot, M.
    Ngo, Y.
    Munteanu, M.
    Marque, S.
    Poynard, T.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 43 (01) : 16 - 29
  • [40] What makes a good systematic review and meta-analysis?
    Moller, A. M.
    Myles, P. S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 117 (04) : 428 - 430