Effect of rice blast and sheath blight on physical properties of selected rice cultivars

被引:19
|
作者
Candole, BL
Siebenmorgen, TJ [1 ]
Lee, FN
Cartwright, RD
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Food Sci, Fayetteville, AR 72703 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Rice Res & Extens Ctr, Stuttgart, AR USA
[3] Univ Arkansas, USDA, Cooperat Extens Serv, Little Rock, AR 72204 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1094/CCHEM.2000.77.5.535
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Observations in 1997 indicated a significant reduction in kernel bulk density and head rice yield of rice cultivar LaGrue due to blast (Pyricularia grisea). A more detailed study on rice cultivar M202 in 1998 confirmed such observations but it also showed negative effects of blast on other physical properties of rice. Rough rice from blast-infected panicles was drier by 7-10 percentage points and 10% thinner than rough rice from blast-free panicles. Blast also caused incidences of chalky, unfilled, and fissured kernels that were 21, 30, and 7 percentage points higher, respectively. The effects of sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani) on kernel thickness and moisture content of rice cultivars Cocodrie, Cypress, Drew, and LaGrue were similar to the effect of blast on M202. Sheath blight generally reduced kernel bulk density but did not significantly affect head rice yield of the cultivars in 1997 and 1998 (except in one sample of Drew). There was a general trend toward higher incidences of unfilled, chalky, and fissured kernels in sheath-blight-infected samples. The data indicated that blast could be a significant preharvest factor in causing high variability in physical properties as well as in reducing the milling quality of rice. Sheath blight is also a potentially significant preharvest factor in affecting these properties in situations where sheath blight pressure is high.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 540
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] NEW FUNGICIDES TO CONTROL SHEATH BLIGHT OF RICE
    GROTH, DE
    RUSH, MC
    [J]. LOUISIANA AGRICULTURE, 1988, 31 (04): : 8 - &
  • [42] Influence of silicon on sheath blight of rice in Brazil
    Rodrigues, FA
    Vale, FXR
    Korndörfer, GH
    Prabhu, AS
    Datnoff, LE
    Oliveira, AMA
    Zambolim, L
    [J]. CROP PROTECTION, 2003, 22 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [43] Progress in rice sheath blight resistance research
    Chen, Jingsheng
    Xuan, Yuanhu
    Yi, Jianghui
    Xiao, Guosheng
    Yuan, De Peng
    Li, Dandan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2023, 14
  • [44] REDUCTION IN RICE YIELD CAUSED BY SHEATH BLIGHT
    BOYETTE, CD
    LEE, FN
    [J]. ARKANSAS FARM RESEARCH, 1979, 28 (03): : 5 - 5
  • [45] INDUCED RESISTANCE IN RICE TO SHEATH BLIGHT DISEASE
    WAHEETA, A
    SREENIVASAPRASAD, S
    CHITRALEKHA, RS
    MANIBHUSHANRAO, K
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 1987, 56 (10): : 486 - 489
  • [46] Enhanced resistance to sheath blight by constitutive expression of infection-related rice chitinase in transgenic elite indica rice cultivars
    Datta, K
    Tu, JM
    Oliva, N
    Ona, I
    Velazhahan, R
    Mew, TW
    Muthukrishnan, S
    Datta, SK
    [J]. PLANT SCIENCE, 2001, 160 (03) : 405 - 414
  • [47] Genetic diversity of rice sheath blight isolates (Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA) from different rice cultivars
    YI Runhua LIANG Chengye ZHU Xiru ZHOU Erxun South China Inst of Botanythe Chinese Academy of ciencesCuangzhou Agri CollegeZhanjiang Ocean UnivZhan jiang Biotechnique Engineering and Chemistry CollegeGuangzhou UnivGuangzhou College of Resources and Environmental SciSouthChina Agri UnivGuangzhou China
    [J]. Chinese Rice Research Newsletter, 2002, (02) : 7 - 8
  • [48] Effect of sheath blight on yield in tropical, intensive rice production system
    Cu, RM
    Mew, TW
    Cassman, KG
    Teng, PS
    [J]. PLANT DISEASE, 1996, 80 (10) : 1103 - 1108
  • [49] EFFECT OF NUTRITIONAL AND MICROCLIMATIC CONDITIONS ON DEVELOPMENT OF SHEATH BLIGHT DISEASE OF RICE
    YU, CM
    LING, KC
    OU, SH
    [J]. PLANT PROTECTION BULLETIN, 1976, 18 (03): : 261 - 267
  • [50] Effect of plant residue on germination of selected rice cultivars
    Kongchum, Manoch
    DeLaune, R. D.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2008, 39 (5-6) : 715 - 725