Behavior Explanation as Intention Signaling in Human-Robot Teaming

被引:0
|
作者
Gong, Ze [1 ]
Zhang, Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Comp Sci & Engn Dept, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Facilitating a shared team understanding is an important task in human-robot teaming. In order to achieve efficient collaboration between the human and robot, it requires not only the robot to understand what the human is doing, but also the robot's behavior be understood by (a.k.a. explainable to) the human. While most prior work has focused on the first aspect, the latter has also begun to draw significant attention. We propose an approach to explaining robot behavior as intention signaling using natural language sentences. In contrast to recent approaches to generating explicable and legible plans, intention signaling does not require the robot to deviate from its optimal plan; neither does it require humans to update their knowledge as generally required for explanation generation. The key questions to be answered here for intention signaling are the what (content of signaling) and when (timing). Based on our prior work, we formulate human interpreting robot actions as a labeling process to be learned. To capture the dependencies between the interpretation of robot actions that are far apart, skip-chain Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) are used. The answers to the when and what can then be converted to an inference problem in the skip-chain CRFs. Potential timings and content of signaling are explored by fixing the labels of certain actions in the CRF model; the configuration that maximizes the underlying probability of being able to associate a label with the remaining actions, which reflects the human's understanding of the robot's plan, is returned for signaling. For evaluation, we construct a synthetic domain to verify that intention signaling can help achieve better teaming by reducing criticism on robot behavior that may appear undesirable but is otherwise required, e.g., due to information asymmetry that results in misinterpretation. We use Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) to assess robot behavior with two settings (i.e., with and without signaling). Results show that our approach achieves the desired effect of creating more explainable robot behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1011
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Online Explanation Generation for Planning Tasks in Human-Robot Teaming
    Zakershahrak, Mehrdad
    Gong, Ze
    Sadassivam, Nikhillesh
    Zhang, Yu
    2020 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2020, : 6304 - 6310
  • [2] Human-Robot Teaming
    Vinson, David W.
    Takayama, Leila
    Forlizzi, Jodi
    Ju, Wendy
    Cakmak, Maya
    Kuzuoka, Hideaki
    CHI 2018: EXTENDED ABSTRACTS OF THE 2018 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2018,
  • [3] Human-robot teaming
    Tierney, TM
    Protzman, WJ
    Samples, B
    Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII, 2005, 5804 : 473 - 484
  • [4] Explainability in Human-Robot Teaming
    Dehkordi, Maryam Banitalebi
    Mansy, Reda
    Zaraki, Abolfazl
    Singh, Arpit
    Setchi, Rossitza
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS (KSE 2021), 2021, 192 : 3487 - 3496
  • [5] The Inner Life of a Robot in Human-Robot Teaming
    Chella, Antonio
    Lanza, Francesco
    Pipitone, Arianna
    Seidita, Valeria
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS (ICHMS), 2020, : 540 - 543
  • [6] Human-Robot Teaming: Grand Challenges
    Manisha Natarajan
    Esmaeil Seraj
    Batuhan Altundas
    Rohan Paleja
    Sean Ye
    Letian Chen
    Reed Jensen
    Kimberlee Chestnut Chang
    Matthew Gombolay
    Current Robotics Reports, 2023, 4 (3): : 81 - 100
  • [7] Workshop on Longitudinal Human-Robot Teaming
    de Greeff, Joachim
    Hayes, Bradley
    Gombolay, Matthew
    Johnson, Matthew
    Neerincx, Mark
    van Diggelen, Jurriaan
    Cefkin, Melissa
    Kruijff-Korbayova, Ivana
    COMPANION OF THE 2018 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI'18), 2018, : 389 - 390
  • [8] Task Interdependence in Human-Robot Teaming
    Zhao, Fangyun
    Henrichs, Curt
    Mutlu, Bilge
    2020 29TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (RO-MAN), 2020, : 1143 - 1149
  • [9] Human-robot teaming for search and rescue
    Nourbakhsh, IR
    Sycara, K
    Koes, M
    Yong, M
    Lewis, M
    Burion, S
    IEEE PERVASIVE COMPUTING, 2005, 4 (01) : 72 - 78
  • [10] Planning for Human-Robot Teaming in Open Worlds
    Talamadupula, Kartik
    Benton, J.
    Kambhampati, Subbarao
    Schermerhorn, Paul
    Scheutz, Matthias
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 1 (02)