Task Interdependence in Human-Robot Teaming

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Fangyun [1 ,2 ]
Henrichs, Curt [2 ]
Mutlu, Bilge [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Psychol, 1202 W Johnson St, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Comp Sci, 1210 W Dayton St, Madison, WI 53706 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
COLLABORATION; DESIGN; SAFETY; JOB;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Human-robot teaming is becoming increasingly common within manufacturing processes. A key aspect practitioners need to decide on when developing effective processes is the level of task interdependence between human and robot team members. Task interdependence refers to the extent to which one's behavior affects the performance of others in a team. In this work, we examine the effects of three levels of task interdependence pooled, sequential, reciprocal in human-robot teaming on human worker's mental states, task performance, and perceptions of the robot. Participants worked with the robot in an assembly task while their heart rate variability was being recorded. Results suggested human workers in the reciprocal interdependence level experienced less stress and perceived the robot more as a collaborator than other two levels. Task interdependence did not affect perceived safety. Our findings highlight the importance of considering task structure in human-robot teaming and inform future research on and industry practices for human-robot task allocation.
引用
收藏
页码:1143 / 1149
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Human-Robot Teaming
    Vinson, David W.
    Takayama, Leila
    Forlizzi, Jodi
    Ju, Wendy
    Cakmak, Maya
    Kuzuoka, Hideaki
    CHI 2018: EXTENDED ABSTRACTS OF THE 2018 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2018,
  • [2] Human-robot teaming
    Tierney, TM
    Protzman, WJ
    Samples, B
    Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII, 2005, 5804 : 473 - 484
  • [3] Explainability in Human-Robot Teaming
    Dehkordi, Maryam Banitalebi
    Mansy, Reda
    Zaraki, Abolfazl
    Singh, Arpit
    Setchi, Rossitza
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS (KSE 2021), 2021, 192 : 3487 - 3496
  • [4] Human-robot teaming in a multi-agent space assembly task
    Rehnmark, F
    Currie, N
    Ambrose, RO
    Culbert, C
    Robotics: Trends, Principles and Applications, Vol 15, 2004, 15 : 69 - 74
  • [5] The Inner Life of a Robot in Human-Robot Teaming
    Chella, Antonio
    Lanza, Francesco
    Pipitone, Arianna
    Seidita, Valeria
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS (ICHMS), 2020, : 540 - 543
  • [6] Human-Robot Teaming: Grand Challenges
    Manisha Natarajan
    Esmaeil Seraj
    Batuhan Altundas
    Rohan Paleja
    Sean Ye
    Letian Chen
    Reed Jensen
    Kimberlee Chestnut Chang
    Matthew Gombolay
    Current Robotics Reports, 2023, 4 (3): : 81 - 100
  • [7] Workshop on Longitudinal Human-Robot Teaming
    de Greeff, Joachim
    Hayes, Bradley
    Gombolay, Matthew
    Johnson, Matthew
    Neerincx, Mark
    van Diggelen, Jurriaan
    Cefkin, Melissa
    Kruijff-Korbayova, Ivana
    COMPANION OF THE 2018 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI'18), 2018, : 389 - 390
  • [8] Human-robot teaming for search and rescue
    Nourbakhsh, IR
    Sycara, K
    Koes, M
    Yong, M
    Lewis, M
    Burion, S
    IEEE PERVASIVE COMPUTING, 2005, 4 (01) : 72 - 78
  • [9] Multi-dimensional task recognition for human-robot teaming: literature review
    Baskaran, Prakash
    Adams, Julie A.
    FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI, 2023, 10
  • [10] Planning for Human-Robot Teaming in Open Worlds
    Talamadupula, Kartik
    Benton, J.
    Kambhampati, Subbarao
    Schermerhorn, Paul
    Scheutz, Matthias
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 1 (02)