Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin on labor induction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:6
|
作者
Liu, Jing [1 ]
Song, Guang [2 ]
Meng, Tao [1 ]
Ji, Lu [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Obstet, 155 Nanjing NorthSt, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] China Med Univ, Shengjing Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Shenyang, Liaoning, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Foley catheter; labor; meta-analysis; oxytocin; pregnant; PROSTAGLANDIN E-2 GEL; INTRAVAGINAL MISOPROSTOL; EXTRAAMNIOTIC SALINE; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2018.1459551
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: It is unclear that whether Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin could improve the efficacy of induction outcome. Method: To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies to evaluate the effect of Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin on labor induction. PubMed, Embase, and other databases were searched from their inception to July 2017. We included all RCTs comparing Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin (i.e. intervention group) with Foley catheter followed by oxytocin (i.e. control group) in the three kinds of women (nulliparas and multiparas/only nulliparas/only multiparas). We estimate summarized relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes, standard mean difference for continuous outcomes. Fixed- and random-effects models were used, depending on heterogeneity. Results: After application of our inclusion and exclusion criteria, six RCTs with a total of 1133 participants were identified. We found that only nulliparas had significant RR of delivery within 24 h (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.55, I-2 = 46.5%). Meanwhile, there was no statistically significant difference between intervention and control groups in vaginal delivery in 24 h, cesarean delivery, time to delivery, and Apgar score at 5 min less than 7. Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin did not increase the risk of side effects, included chorioamnionitis, postpartum hemorrhage, uterine hyperstimulation, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Conclusion: The results seem to support the use of oxytocin to a Foley catheter at the initiation of labor induction, as it might lead to increases the rate of delivery within 24 h in nulliparas.
引用
收藏
页码:3168 / 3175
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Parous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Abraham, Cynthia
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 132 (04): : 1062 - 1063
  • [22] Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ausbeck, Elizabeth B.
    Jauk, Victoria C.
    Xue, Yumo
    Files, Pamela
    Kuper, Spencer G.
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Casey, Brian M.
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    Tita, Alan T.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (03): : 597 - 606
  • [23] Vaginal dinoprostone versus Foley catheter for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial
    Liu, Xiaohua
    Huang, Ding
    Liu, Yang
    Qu, Cuicui
    Mo, Huiqin
    Zhao, Xin
    Li, Wentao
    Mol, Ben Willem W.
    Shen, Hong
    Cheng, Weiwei
    Ying, Hao
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (01) : S59 - S60
  • [24] A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction
    Chung, JH
    Huang, WH
    Rumney, PJ
    Garite, TJ
    Nageotte, MP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (04) : 1031 - 1035
  • [25] Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol for induction of labor: individual participant data meta-analysis
    Kemper, J., I
    Li, W.
    Goni, S.
    Flanagan, M.
    Weeks, A.
    Alfirevic, Z.
    Bracken, H.
    Mundle, S.
    Goonewardene, M.
    Ten Eikelder, M.
    Bloemenkamp, K.
    Rengerink, K. O.
    Kruit, H.
    Mol, B. W.
    Palmer, K. R.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 57 (02) : 215 - 223
  • [26] Six vs 12-hour balloon catheter placement for the induction of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Rashid, Attyia
    Imran, Muhammad
    Ali, Shujaat
    Mehmood, Areeba Mariam
    Khalil, Saba
    Farooq, Dawood Azam
    Kamran, Ateeba
    Zamir, Shamaila
    Khan, Ubaid
    Abuelazm, Mohamed
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (11)
  • [27] Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor at Term: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gu, Ning
    Ru, Tong
    Wang, Zhiqun
    Dai, Yimin
    Zheng, Mingming
    Xu, Biyun
    Hu, Yali
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [28] Outpatient Foley catheter for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a randomized-controlled trial
    Ausbeck, Elizabeth B.
    Jauk, Victoria C.
    Xue, Yumo
    Files, Pamela
    Kuper, Spencer
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Casey, Brian M.
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    Tita, Alan T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S759 - S759
  • [29] Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Parous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial Reply
    Kuper, Spencer G.
    Jauk, Victoria C.
    Edwards, Rodney K.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 132 (04): : 1063 - 1063
  • [30] Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: Randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion
    Guinn, DA
    Davies, JK
    Jones, RO
    Sullivan, L
    Wolf, D
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (01) : 225 - 229