Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin on labor induction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:6
|
作者
Liu, Jing [1 ]
Song, Guang [2 ]
Meng, Tao [1 ]
Ji, Lu [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Obstet, 155 Nanjing NorthSt, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] China Med Univ, Shengjing Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Shenyang, Liaoning, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Foley catheter; labor; meta-analysis; oxytocin; pregnant; PROSTAGLANDIN E-2 GEL; INTRAVAGINAL MISOPROSTOL; EXTRAAMNIOTIC SALINE; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2018.1459551
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: It is unclear that whether Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin could improve the efficacy of induction outcome. Method: To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies to evaluate the effect of Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin on labor induction. PubMed, Embase, and other databases were searched from their inception to July 2017. We included all RCTs comparing Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin (i.e. intervention group) with Foley catheter followed by oxytocin (i.e. control group) in the three kinds of women (nulliparas and multiparas/only nulliparas/only multiparas). We estimate summarized relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes, standard mean difference for continuous outcomes. Fixed- and random-effects models were used, depending on heterogeneity. Results: After application of our inclusion and exclusion criteria, six RCTs with a total of 1133 participants were identified. We found that only nulliparas had significant RR of delivery within 24 h (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.55, I-2 = 46.5%). Meanwhile, there was no statistically significant difference between intervention and control groups in vaginal delivery in 24 h, cesarean delivery, time to delivery, and Apgar score at 5 min less than 7. Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin did not increase the risk of side effects, included chorioamnionitis, postpartum hemorrhage, uterine hyperstimulation, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Conclusion: The results seem to support the use of oxytocin to a Foley catheter at the initiation of labor induction, as it might lead to increases the rate of delivery within 24 h in nulliparas.
引用
收藏
页码:3168 / 3175
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital versus speculum insertion of Foley catheter for labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Baradwan, Saeed
    Alshahrani, Majed Saeed
    AlSghan, Rayan
    Sabban, Hussein
    Khadawardi, Khalid
    Alyafi, Mohammad
    Hafedh, Bandr
    Alayed, Nada M.
    Rashed, Zaky Ftouh
    Abdel-Hakam, Faiza Ahmed
    Elshabrawi, Mohamed Nasser
    Abdelhakim, Ahmed Mohamed
    Ahmed, Walaa Elsayed
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 53 (05)
  • [2] Intracervical Foley Catheter With and Without Oxytocin for Labor Induction A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Schoen, Corina N.
    Grant, Gwendolyn
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Hoffman, Matthew K.
    Sciscione, Anthony
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (06): : 1046 - 1053
  • [3] Traction vs no traction in Foley catheter use for induction of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Schoen, Corina N.
    Saccone, Gabriele
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Baker, Elizabeth G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2022, 4 (04)
  • [4] Propranolol and oxytocin versus oxytocin alone for induction and augmentation of labor: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Vasilios Pergialiotis
    Maximos Frountzas
    Anastasia Prodromidou
    Sofia Prapa
    Despina N. Perrea
    Georgios D. Vlachos
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2016, 293 : 721 - 729
  • [5] Propranolol and oxytocin versus oxytocin alone for induction and augmentation of labor: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Pergialiotis, Vasilios
    Frountzas, Maximos
    Prodromidou, Anastasia
    Prapa, Sofia
    Perrea, Despina N.
    Vlachos, Georgios D.
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 293 (04) : 721 - 729
  • [6] The intracervical foley catheter with and without oxytocin for labor induction: a randomized trial
    Schoen, Corina
    Grant, Gwendolyn
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Hoffmann, Matthew
    Sciscione, Anthony
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S30 - S31
  • [7] Controlled-release dinoprostone insert versus Foley catheter for labor induction: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Hongye
    Hong, Shukun
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    Duan, Yan
    Yin, Hongmei
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (14): : 2382 - 2388
  • [8] Early versus delayed oxytocin infusion following amniotomy for induction of labor: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Pergialiotis, Vasilios
    Bellos, Ioannis
    Vrachnis, Nikolaos
    Papantoniou, Nikolaos
    Loutradis, Dimitrios
    Daskalakis, George
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (25): : 4889 - 4896
  • [9] A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction
    Moraes Filho, Olimpio B.
    Albuquerque, Rivaldo M.
    Cecatti, Jose G.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 89 (08) : 1045 - 1052
  • [10] Induction of Labor Using a Foley Catheter or Misoprostol: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G.
    Mast, Kelly
    van der Velden, Annemarie
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
    Mol, Ben W.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2016, 71 (10) : 620 - 630