Field measurements of PM2.5 emissions from typical solid fuel combustion in rural households in Fenhe Basin, China

被引:18
|
作者
Zhang, Bin [1 ]
Wang, Cen [2 ]
Sun, Jian [1 ]
He, Kun [1 ]
Zou, Haijiang [1 ]
Xu, Hongmei [1 ]
Li, Jianjun [3 ]
Ho, Kin-Fai [4 ]
Shen, Zhenxing [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Xian Key Lab Solid Waste Recycling & Resource Rec, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] Shaanxi Prov Inst Water Resources & Elect Power I, 57 Dongda St, Xian 710001, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Earth Environm, State Key Lab Loess & Quaternary Geol, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Jockey Club Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Biomass; Coal; Elevated kang; Fine particulate matter; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Formation mechanism; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS; RESIDENTIAL WOOD COMBUSTION; POLLUTANT EMISSIONS; GUANZHONG PLAIN; PARTICULATE MATTER; BROWN CARBON; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; COAL COMBUSTION; SOURCE PROFILES; COOKING STOVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.envres.2022.113361
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Solid fuel is the most widely used energy source for cooking and heating in the rural households in developing countries. In this study, emissions from 13 fuel-stove combinations were studied in two typical rural villages in the Fenhe Basin, Shanxi Province, China. This study gathered data on the emission characteristics of particles with an aerodynamic diameter of <2.5 mu m (PM2.5), organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC), and 21 parent and oxygenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (pPAHs and oPAHs, respectively); the mechanism of gas formation was also determined. The PM2.5 EFs of biomass burning ranged from 4.11 +/- 2.12 to 138 +/- 47.2 g/kg, which was higher than that of coal combustion (1.57 +/- 0.89 to 4.11 +/- 0.63 g/kg). Notably, the average PM2.5 EFs of biomass burning in a traditional stove and elevated kang were 50.9 +/- 13.8 and 23.0 +/- 3.99 g/kg, respectively, suggesting that the elevated kang had superior emission mitigation. Wood pellet burning in a biomass furnace yielded lower PM2.5 EFs than firewood burning in the biomass furnace, which demonstrated wood pellet combustion's superior emission reduction effect. The relative contribution of OC4 to OC subfractions may be useable as tools for identifying the sources of coal and biomass burning. Regarding PAHs, biomass with abundant lignin pyrolysis produced numerous hydroxyl radicals that were conducive to the release of greater proportions of oPAHs. By contrast, pPAHs had greater relative contributions in coal combustion. Regarding gaseous pollutants, its formation mechanism varied with combustion phase. Emission differences between the two phases were mainly determined by the relative contributions of volatile C/N and char. Clarifying the pollutant formation mechanism can better guide the implementation of emission control from household solid fuel combustion.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PM2.5 emissions from light-duty gasoline vehicles in Beijing, China
    Shen, Xianbao
    Yao, Zhiliang
    Huo, Hong
    He, Kebin
    Zhang, Yingzhi
    Liu, Huan
    Ye, Yu
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 487 : 521 - 527
  • [32] Organic compounds in PM2.5 emitted from fireplace and woodstove combustion of typical Portuguese wood species
    Goncalves, Catia
    Alves, Celia
    Fernandes, Ana Patricia
    Monteiro, Cristina
    Tarelho, Luis
    Evtyugina, Margarita
    Pio, Casimiro
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 45 (27) : 4533 - 4545
  • [33] Ground-Based Field Measurements of PM2.5 Emission Factors From Flaming and Smoldering Combustion in Eucalypt Forests
    Reisen, F.
    Meyer, C. P.
    Weston, C. J.
    Volkova, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2018, 123 (15) : 8301 - 8314
  • [34] Evaluation of PAHs, PM2.5 and gaseous emissions from solid fuel direct-fired and cross-draft stoves
    Tohniyaz, Bahargul
    Zhao, Nan
    Mperejekumana, Philbert
    Zhou, Yuguang
    Chen, Deying
    Li, Gang
    Molelekwa, Gomotsegang Fred
    Zayan, Ali Mohammed Ibrahim
    Dong, Renjie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2022, 102 (06) : 1318 - 1331
  • [35] Real-World Emission Characteristics of Environmentally Persistent Free Radicals in PM2.5 from Residential Solid Fuel Combustion
    Zhao, Jinfeng
    Shen, Guofeng
    Shi, Lin
    Li, Hao
    Lang, Di
    Zhang, Lu
    Pan, Bo
    Tao, Shu
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 56 (07) : 3997 - 4004
  • [36] Measurements of emission factors of PM2.5, OC, EC, and BC for household stoves of coal combustion in China
    Chen, Yingjun
    Tian, Chongguo
    Feng, Yanli
    Zhi, Guorui
    Li, Jun
    Zhang, Gan
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 109 : 190 - 196
  • [37] Quantification of Global Primary Emissions of PM2.5, PM10, and TSP from Combustion and Industrial Process Sources
    Huang, Ye
    Shen, Huizhong
    Chen, Han
    Wang, Rong
    Zhang, Yanyan
    Su, Shu
    Chen, Yuanchen
    Lin, Nan
    Zhuo, Shaojie
    Zhong, Qirui
    Wang, Xilong
    Liu, Junfeng
    Li, Bengang
    Liu, Wenxin
    Tao, Shu
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (23) : 13834 - 13843
  • [38] The oxidative potential of PM2.5 exposures from indoor and outdoor sources in rural China
    Secrest, Matthew H.
    Schauer, James J.
    Carter, Ellison M.
    Lai, Alexandra M.
    Wang, Yuqin
    Shan, Ming
    Yang, Xudong
    Zhang, Yuanxun
    Baumgartner, Jill
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 571 : 1477 - 1489
  • [39] Evaluation of the emissions and uncertainties of PM2.5 originated from vehicular traffic and domestic wood combustion in Finland
    Karvosenoja, Niko
    Tainio, Marko
    Kupiainen, Kaarle
    Tuomisto, Jouni T.
    Kukkonen, Jaakko
    Johansson, Matti
    [J]. BOREAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2008, 13 (05): : 465 - 474
  • [40] Catalytic Temperature Effects on Conversion Efficiency of PM2.5 and Gaseous Emissions from Rice Husk Combustion
    Abah, Emmanuel Owoicho
    Ahamed, Tofael
    Noguchi, Ryozo
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (19)