Groundwater vulnerability assessment to pollution in Kasihan, Bantul Regency: A comparative method study (GOD, SINTACS and DRASTIC)

被引:0
|
作者
Purnama, Ignasius Loyola Setyawan [1 ]
Primacintya, Vincentia Anindha [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gadjah Mada, Fac Geog, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[2] Univ Gadjah Mada, Fac Econ & Business, Accounting Programme, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
关键词
D O I
10.1051/e3sconf/202020002012
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Groundwater vulnerability to pollution refers to the ease with which pollutants reach groundwater, in other words indicating the level of ease of an area to experience pollution. At present, the theme is one of the themes that attracts many researchers because pollution is more frequent in an area. The purpose of this study is to assess groundwater vulnerability in the study area for pollution using the GOD method and conduct a study of 3 groundwater vulnerability assessments, to determine the most appropriate assessment to be applied in the study area. The method used to determine groundwater vulnerability to pollution is GOD, which uses three parameters to assess the vulnerability of groundwater, namely aquifer type, rock type above aquifer and groundwater level. Furthermore, the results of the vulnerability assessment using the GOD method are compared with the vulnerability assessment according to the SINTACS and DRASTIC methods that have been carried out before in this area. The results showed that the variation of groundwater vulnerability index values in the study area according to the GOD method was from 0.35 to 0.63. Locations that are classified as medium vulnerability are generally located in the limestone Sentolo Formation, while locations that are classified as high vulnerability class are located in the volcanic rock of Yogyakarta Formation. Noting the results of determining groundwater vulnerability from the three methods, it can be said that the three methods are suitable for assessing groundwater vulnerability in the study area. However, looking at the distribution pattern of the level of pollution, the DRASTIC method can provide more detailed results related to the level of vulnerability.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modified DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment in areas with diverse Quaternary deposits
    Mannik, Magdaleena
    Karro, Enn
    Marandi, Andres
    Polikarpus, Maile
    Ani, Tavo
    Rosentau, Alar
    [J]. HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 54 (07): : 840 - 854
  • [42] Groundwater contamination vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC method, GSA, and uncertainty analysis
    Dizaji, Alireza Razavi
    Hosseini, Seyed Abbas
    Rezaverdinejad, Vahid
    Sharafati, Ahmad
    [J]. ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2020, 13 (14)
  • [43] A modified SINTACS method for groundwater vulnerability and pollution risk assessment in highly anthropized regions based on NO3- and SO42- concentrations
    Busico, Gianluigi
    Kazakis, Nerantzis
    Colombani, Nicolo
    Mastrocicco, Micol
    Voudouris, Konstantinos
    Tedesco, Dario
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 609 : 1512 - 1523
  • [44] Groundwater contamination vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC method, GSA, and uncertainty analysis
    Alireza Razavi Dizaji
    Seyed Abbas Hosseini
    Vahid Rezaverdinejad
    Ahmad Sharafati
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2020, 13
  • [45] Determination of groundwater vulnerability in karstic environments by using SINTACS method: Altinova aquifer case study
    Amil, Aysenur
    Cil, Ahmet
    Avci, Pinar
    Muhammetoglu, Ayse
    Ozyurt, Naciye Nur
    [J]. PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2020, 26 (03): : 559 - 571
  • [46] Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution using DRASTIC Model and Fuzzy Logic in Herat City, Afghanistan
    Gesim, Nasir Ahmad
    Okazaki, Takeo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2018, 9 (10) : 181 - 188
  • [47] Assessment and Estimating Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution Using a Modified DRASTIC and GODS Models (Case Study: Malayer Plain of Iran)
    Hosseini, Maryam
    Saremi, Ali
    [J]. CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2018, 4 (02): : 433 - 442
  • [48] Groundwater vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC model: a comparative analysis of conventional, AHP, Fuzzy logic and Frequency ratio method
    Smitarani Lad
    Rashmi Ayachit
    Ajaykumar Kadam
    Bhavana Umrikar
    [J]. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2019, 5 : 543 - 553
  • [49] A comparison study of DRASTIC methods with various objective methods for groundwater vulnerability assessment
    Khosravi, Khabat
    Sartaj, Majid
    Tsai, Frank T-C
    Singh, Vijay P.
    Kazakis, Nerantzis
    Melesse, Assefa M.
    Prakash, Indra
    Bui, Dieu Tien
    Binh Thai Pham
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 642 : 1032 - 1049
  • [50] Groundwater vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC model: a comparative analysis of conventional, AHP, Fuzzy logic and Frequency ratio method
    Lad, Smitarani
    Ayachit, Rashmi
    Kadam, Ajaykumar
    Umrikar, Bhavana
    [J]. MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 5 (02) : 543 - 553