Comparison between a spectral and probability density function model for turbulent reacting flows

被引:4
|
作者
Vaithianathan, T [1 ]
Ulitsky, M
Collins, LR
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Chem Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Sibley Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1540-7489(02)80260-7
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study compares the performance of a newly developed spectral model based on the eddy damped quasi-normal Markovian (EDQNM) theory with a standard probability density function (PDF) model for the case of two initially unmixed reactants undergoing a finite-rate bimolecular reaction. The two models were chosen because they involve complementary treatments of the nonlinearities and mixing terms. That is, nonlinearities are exactly treated in the PDF and mixing is modeled, whereas the opposite is true for EDQNM. The predictions of the two models are compared to direct numerical simulations. The results show that the PDF model is capable of describing the mixing of the major species reasonably well, but fails to describe the correlations between the reactants and the products even qualitatively. This suggests that the mixing model in the PDF is adequate for describing mixing between major species, but is incapable of describing mixing of the more spatially segregated product species. The EDQNM model does a slightly better job of describing the mixing of reactant species and a much better job of describing mixing of the product species. Presumably the improvement is associated with the more accurate description of the interscale dynamics that are especially important for the segregated products. The implication is that a model that combines the strengths of the EDQNM for describing mixing and the PDF for describing the nonlinearities would yield the best of both worlds.
引用
收藏
页码:2139 / 2146
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Presumed joint probability density function model for turbulent combustion
    Guo, ZM
    Zhang, HQ
    Chan, CK
    Lin, WY
    [J]. FUEL, 2003, 82 (09) : 1091 - 1101
  • [32] Probability-density function model of turbulent hydrogen flames
    Hsu, AT
    He, GB
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2000, 67 (1-2) : 117 - 135
  • [33] Probability density function (PDF) and filtered density function (FDF) methods for turbulent scalar dispersion in incompressible flows
    Cassiani, M.
    Albertson, J. D.
    Franzese, P.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN TURBULENCE XI, 2007, 117 : 529 - +
  • [34] A two-fluid model for gas-particle turbulent flows based on the probability density function approach
    Wang, Lu
    Xu, Jiangrong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS C, 2019, 30 (01):
  • [35] The uniform conditional state model for turbulent reacting flows
    Hendra, Graham R.
    Bushe, W. K.
    [J]. COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2019, 205 : 484 - 505
  • [36] SIMULATION OF TURBULENT REACTING FLOWS ON THE BASIS OF EQUATIONS FOR SPECTRAL CHARACTERISTICS.
    Sosinovich, V.A.
    Tsyganov, V.A.
    [J]. Heat transfer. Soviet research, 1985, 17 (06): : 80 - 88
  • [37] A subgrid-scale mixing model for large-eddy simulations of turbulent reacting flows using the filtered density function
    Cha, CM
    Trouillet, P
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2003, 15 (06) : 1496 - 1504
  • [38] Temporal characteristics of the probability density function of velocity in wall-bounded turbulent flows
    Laskari, Angeliki
    McKeon, Beverley J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2021, 913
  • [39] Probability density function Monte Carlo simulation of near-wall turbulent flows
    Dreeben, TD
    Pope, SB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1998, 357 : 141 - 166
  • [40] Probability density function of streamwise velocity fluctuation in turbulent T-junction flows
    Lin, Mei
    Qiao, Xiaoyu
    Yin, Yantao
    Lin, Zhimin
    Wang, Qiuwang
    [J]. 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY (ICAE2016), 2017, 105 : 5005 - 5010