Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial

被引:31
|
作者
Johnson, Kristin [1 ]
Zackrisson, Sophia [1 ]
Rosso, Aldana [1 ]
Sartor, Hanna [1 ]
Saal, Lao H. [2 ]
Andersson, Ingvar [1 ]
Lang, Kristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Translat Med, Diagnost Radiol, Inga Marie Nilssons Gata 49, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci Lund, Div Oncol & Pathol, Translat Oncogen Unit, Lund, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
MAMMOGRAPHY; GRADE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2019190132
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Screening accuracy can be improved with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). To further evaluate DBT in screening, it is important to assess the molecular subtypes of the detected cancers. Purpose: To describe tumor characteristics, including molecular subtypes, of cancers detected at DBT compared with those detected at digital mammography (DM) in breast cancer screening. Materials and Methods: The Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial is a prospective, population-based screening trial comparing one-view DBT with two-view DM. Tumor characteristics were obtained, and invasive cancers were classified according to St Gallen as follows: luminal A-like, luminal B-like human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-negative/HER2-positive, HER2-positive, and triple-negative cancers. Tumor characteristics were compared by mode of detection: DBT alone or DM (ie, DBT and DM or DM alone). chi(2) test was used for data analysis. Results: Between January 2010 and February 2015, 14 848 women were enrolled (mean age, 57 years +/- 10; age range, 40-76 years). In total, 139 cancers were detected; 118 cancers were invasive and 21 were ductal carcinomas in situ. Thirty-seven additional invasive cancers (36 cancers with complete subtypes and stage) were detected at DBT alone, and 81 cancers (80 cancers with complete stage) were detected at DM. No differences were seen between DBT and DM in the distribution of tumor size 20 mm or smaller (86% [31 of 36] vs 85% [68 of 80], respectively; P = .88), node-negative status (75% [27 of 36] vs 74% [59 of 80], respectively; P = .89), or luminal A-like subtype (53% [19 of 36] vs 46% [37 of 81], respectively; P = .48). Conclusion: The biologic profile of the additional cancers detected at digital breast tomosynthesis in a large prospective population-based screening trial was similar to those detected at digital mammography, and the majority were early-stage luminal A-like cancers. This indicates that digital breast tomosynthesis screening does not alter the predictive and prognostic profile of screening-detected cancers. (C) RSNA, 2019
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 281
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
    Skaane, Per
    Sebuodegard, Sofie
    Bandos, Andriy I.
    Gur, David
    Osteras, Bjorn Helge
    Gullien, Randi
    Hofvind, Solveig
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 169 (03) : 489 - 496
  • [22] Implications of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: Reducing Advanced Breast Cancers
    Kim, Soo-Yeon
    Woo, Ok Hee
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 312 (03)
  • [23] Identifying and Modelling Clinical Subpopulations from the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
    Torlegard, B.
    Tingberg, A.
    Zackrisson, S.
    Barufaldi, B.
    Maidment, A. D. A.
    Dustler, M.
    Bakic, P. R.
    15TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON BREAST IMAGING (IWBI2020), 2020, 11513
  • [24] False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
    Johnson, Kristin
    Olinder, Jakob
    Rosso, Aldana
    Andersson, Ingvar
    Lang, Kristina
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (11) : 8089 - 8099
  • [25] False positives in breast cancer screening with one-view breast tomosynthesis: An analysis of findings leading to recall, work-up and biopsy rates in the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
    Lang, Kristina
    Nergarden, Matilda
    Andersson, Ingvar
    Rosso, Aldana
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (11) : 3899 - 3907
  • [26] Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study
    Lang, Kristina
    Andersson, Ingvar
    Rosso, Aldana
    Tingberg, Anders
    Timberg, Pontus
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (01) : 184 - 190
  • [27] Interval cancer in the Cordoba Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (CBTST): comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis plus digital mammography to digital mammography alone
    Pulido-Carmona, Cristina
    Romero-Martin, Sara
    Raya-Povedano, Jose Luis
    Cara-Garcia, Maria
    Font-Ugalde, Pilar
    Elias-Cabot, Esperanza
    Pedrosa-Garriguet, Margarita
    Alvarez-Benito, Marina
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (08) : 5427 - 5438
  • [28] Is Tomosynthesis the Future of Breast Cancer Screening?
    Pisano, Etta D.
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 287 (01) : 47 - 48
  • [29] Community-Based Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Comparison of Screening Performance and Tumor Characteristics
    Regen-Tuero, Helaina C.
    Ram, Shruthi
    Gass, Jennifer S.
    Lourenco, Ana P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 218 (02) : 249 - 256
  • [30] Addition of Screening Breast US to Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Average Risk
    Yi, Ann
    Jang, Myoung-jin
    Yim, Dahae
    Kwon, Bo Ra
    Shin, Sung Ui
    Chang, Jung Min
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 298 (03) : 568 - 575