Efficacy of pulse dexamethasone in non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Objective. Early aggressive therapy using biologicals is increasingly being used in JIA for early disease remission. Pulse steroids are used in induction regimes for rheumatic disorders such as SLE and systemic JIA; however, no controlled studies have demonstrated their use in non-systemic JIA. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pulse dexamethasone therapy in children with treatment-naive non-systemic JIA as early aggressive therapy in resource-limited settings. Methods. Sixty treatment-naive children with non-systemic JIA with an active joint count of >= 5 and/or involvement of hip or cervical joints were randomized to receive either pulse dexamethasone (3 mg/kg/day, max 100 mg/day) or placebo (normal saline) for three consecutive days during each visit at 0, 6 (+/- 2) and 12 (+/- 2)weeks; along with standard therapy (MTX and NSAIDs). The use of oral bridge steroids was permissible for persistent severe disease as per predefined criteria. The primary outcome was ACR-Pedi 70 response at 16 (+/- 2)weeks after enrolment in the two groups. Results. The proportion of children achieving ACR-Pedi 70 in the two groups at last follow-up was 11/30 (36.7%) in pulse dexamethasone arm vs 11/28 (39.3%) in the placebo arm (P-value 0.837, relative risk 0.93, 95% CI 0.48, 1.80). We did not observe any significant difference in the proportion of children requiring bridge steroids. Adverse events were comparable in the two groups. Conclusion. The addition of pulse dexamethasone to standard treatment may not add any advantage in improving ACR-Pedi 70 scores at medium-term follow-up.