共 50 条
Spasticity in practice (SPACE): an international non-interventional study of botulinum neurotoxin type-A in treatment-naive subjects with spasticity
被引:4
|作者:
Harriss, Julian
[1
]
Roche, Nicolas
[2
]
Cantu-Brito, Carlos
[3
]
Khatkova, Svetlana
[4
]
Satero, Patrik
[5
]
Heitmann, Susanne
[6
]
Simon, Olivier
[7
]
Kliebe-Frisch, Christine
[7
]
Comes, Georg
[7
]
Jost, Wolfgang H.
[8
,9
]
机构:
[1] IRMA Independent Rehabil Med Assessment, London, England
[2] Hop Raymond Poincare, Garches, France
[3] Inst Nacl Ciencias Med & Nutr Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[4] Minist Hlth, Fed State Hosp Treatment & Rehabil, Moscow, Russia
[5] Sahlgrenska Univ Ssjukhuset Hogsbo, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] DKD HELIOS Clin Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
[7] Merz Pharmaceut GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
[8] Parkinson Klin Ortenau, Wolfach, Germany
[9] Univ Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
关键词:
botulinum neurotoxin A;
rehabilitation;
muscle spasticity;
quality of life;
TOXIN TYPE-A;
UPPER-LIMB SPASTICITY;
POSTSTROKE SPASTICITY;
NT;
201;
EFFICACY;
SAFETY;
ADULTS;
INCOBOTULINUMTOXINA;
ABOBOTULINUMTOXINA;
D O I:
10.5603/PJNNS.a2021.0001
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Aim of the study. SPACE, a prospective, non-interventional, open-label, multinational study, investigated physicians' and subjects' assessment of safety, efficacy, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following botulinum neurotoxin type-A (BoNT-A) treatment to understand real-world clinical usage for the management of focal and multifocal spasticity. Clinical rationale for the study. Treatment guidelines recommend the use of BoNT-A for the management of spasticity in adults. This study assessed how physicians use BoNT-A therapy in real-world clinical practice, and provided evidence on long-term safety and efficacy over a period of up to 2 years. Materials and methods. BoNT treatment-naive adults with spasticity of any aetiology received any BoNT-A formulation at their physician's discretion, and were observed for <= 8 treatment cycles (<= 2 years). Daily practice information, physician's global assessments of tolerability and efficacy, and HRQoL were documented. Incidences of adverse drug reactions or all adverse events were documented for non-Mexican subjects and for Mexican subjects, respectively, due to protocol differences based on local regulatory requirements. Results. A total of 701 subjects were enrolled (safety population; nine countries). Physicians rated the tolerability of BoNT-A as 'very good' or 'good' for 88.2-97.4% of subjects throughout the study (subject numbers declined throughout this non-interventional study). Adverse drug reactions were reported for 16/600 (2.7%) of the non-Mexican subjects, with two considered to be 'definitely related' to treatment (injection-site haematoma, n = 1; botulism, n = 1). For 687 subjects, efficacy was rated 'very good' or 'good' by most physicians and subjects. Improvements in HRQoL were observed. Conclusions and clinical implications. Throughout this 2-year study, BoNT-A treatment was generally well-tolerated, effective, and associated with an improved HRQoL. This study makes a valuable contribution to the broader understanding of how physicians use BoNT-A therapy to manage spasticity in real-world clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 173
页数:9
相关论文