A typology of crowdfunding sponsors: Birds of a feather flock together?

被引:113
|
作者
Ryu, Sunghan [1 ]
Kim, Young-Gul [2 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Coll Business, Dept Informat Syst, 83 Tat Chee Ave, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Coll Business, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Crowdfunding; Co-creation; E-commerce; Customer typology; Motivation; Personality; Big-five model; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; SELF-DETERMINATION; 5-FACTOR MODEL; PERSONALITY; PERFORMANCE; ANTECEDENTS; CROWD; CONSEQUENCES; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.elerap.2016.01.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study develops a crowdfunding sponsor typology based on sponsors' motivations for participating in a project. Using a two by two crowdfunding motivation framework, we analyzed six relevant funding motivations-interest, playfulness, philanthropy, reward, relationship, and recognition-and identified four types of crowdfunding sponsors: angelic backer, reward hunter, avid fan, and tasteful hermit. They are profiled in terms of the antecedents and consequences of funding motivations. Angelic backers are similar in some ways to traditional charitable donors while reward hunters are analogous to market investors; thus they differ in their approach to crowdfunding. Avid fans comprise the most passionate sponsor group, and they are similar to members of a brand community. Tasteful hermits support their projects as actively as avid fans, but they have lower extrinsic and others-oriented motivations. The results show that these sponsor types reflect the nature of crowdfunding as a new form of co-creation in the E-commerce context. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 54
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Birds of a feather flock together: A study of new shareholders and Swedish IPOs
    Abrahamson, Martin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2018, 18 : 1 - 17
  • [42] LINEs, SINEs and other retroelements: do birds of a feather flock together?
    Roy-Engel, Astrid M.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK, 2012, 17 : 1345 - 1361
  • [43] Cohesinopathies of a Feather Flock Together
    Skibbens, Robert V.
    Colquhoun, Jennifer M.
    Green, Megan J.
    Molnar, Cody A.
    Sin, Danielle N.
    Sullivan, Brian J.
    Tanzosh, Eden E.
    [J]. PLOS GENETICS, 2013, 9 (12):
  • [44] BUGS OF A FEATHER FLOCK TOGETHER
    PALMER, D
    [J]. NEW SCIENTIST, 1995, 148 (2002) : 20 - 20
  • [45] Aggressive behavior in preschoolers' social networks: Do birds of a feather flock together?
    Farver, JAM
    [J]. EARLY CHILDHOOD RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1996, 11 (03) : 333 - 350
  • [46] Birds of a feather flock together: trust in government, political selection and electoral punishment
    Massimo Finocchiaro Castro
    Calogero Guccio
    [J]. Public Choice, 2020, 184 : 263 - 287
  • [47] Do Birds of a Feather Flock Together? Rebel Constituencies and Civil War Alliances
    Balcells, Laia
    Chen, Chong
    Pischedda, Costantino
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2022, 66 (01)
  • [48] Birds of feather flock together: A longitudinal study of a social media outreach effort
    Cavanah, Sarah
    Owens, Seth
    Kemink, Kaylan
    Riley, Collin
    Kim, Soojung
    Lee, Joonghwa
    Ellis-Felege, Susan
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2023, 281
  • [49] LOCATION CHOICE OF MULTINATIONAL AND LOCAL FIRMS IN VIETNAM: BIRDS OF A FEATHER FLOCK TOGETHER?
    Yang, Chih-Hai
    Chiu, Chung-Yueh
    Tsou, Meng-Wen
    [J]. JAPANESE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 68 (01) : 95 - 114
  • [50] Birds of a feather flock together: Understanding Filipino millennial academic managers' mindset
    Obmerga, Marwin E.
    de Guzman, Allan B.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION & LEADERSHIP, 2024, 52 (05) : 1206 - 1230