Efficacy and cost of different treatment in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:12
|
作者
Dai, Pinyuan [1 ]
Xie, Weihua [2 ,3 ]
Yu, Xiaojin [1 ]
Sun, Jinfang [1 ]
Wang, Shiyuan [1 ]
Kawuki, Joseph [4 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Stat, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Dept Qual Management, Affiliated Hosp 2, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Wenzhou Med Univ, Yuying Childrens Hosp, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, JC Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Ctr Hlth Behav Res, Fac Med, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Idiopathic membranous nephropathy; Immunosuppressant; Meta-analysis; Cost-effectiveness analysis; METHYLPREDNISOLONE PLUS CHLORAMBUCIL; MYCOPHENOLATE-MOFETIL; NEPHROTIC SYNDROME; TACROLIMUS MONOTHERAPY; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; LONG-TERM; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; RISK; CORTICOSTEROIDS; CYCLOSPORINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107376
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is the most common pathological type of adult nephrotic syndrome. However, the treatments for IMN patients had not been compared from the perspectives of therapeutic effect and pharmacoeconomics. Therefore, a network meta-analysis and a cost-effectiveness analysis were conducted to find the optimum treatment for IMN patients. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the treatments including cyclophosphamide (CTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine (CsA), tacrolimus (TAC), leflunomide (LEF), chlorambucil (CLB) and rituximab (RTX) for patients with IMN were reviewed. The complete and partial remission rates were extracted and then compared by network meta-analysis. The surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) was calculated to rank the remission rate for all treatments. Then, the cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to compared the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of different treatments. Results: A total of 75 articles with 4806 participants were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Compared with the glucocorticoids (GC) group, CTX + GC (95%RR 1.02,1.76), CsA + GC (95%RR 1.11,2.13) and TAC + GC (95%RR 1.44,2.59) were associated with a significantly higher rate of complete remission. TAC + GC were most likely to be ranked the best (SUCRA of 92.1%). From the perspective of the costeffectiveness analysis in China, the ICER of LEF + GC to CTX + GC was $30616.336 per unit utility, and that of TAC + GC to CTX + GC was $670475.210 per unit utility. And the ICER of CTX + GC to LEF + GC in the UK was $-65680.879 per unit utility. Conclusions: CTX + GC was the cheapest treatment with obvious curative effect in China, while LEF + GC was a cost-effective alternative to CTX + GC. The remission rate of TAC + GC was highest despite the high single-dose cost.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-effectiveness of intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients: A meta-analysis
    Malesker, MA
    Morrow, LE
    Burns, TL
    Hilleman, DE
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (12) : A83 - A83
  • [42] Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions among Chinese Adults with Prediabetes: A Protocol for Network Meta-Analysis and CHIME-Modeled Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Yin, Yue
    Tu, Yusi
    Zhao, Mingye
    Tang, Wenxi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (03)
  • [43] COMPARATIVE EFFICIENCY RESEARCH: META-ANALYSIS OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS STUDIES
    Crespo, C.
    Monleon, A.
    Diaz, W.
    Rodriguez, C.
    Brosa, M.
    Rios, M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A617 - A617
  • [44] Blood Donation and Monetary Incentives: A Meta-Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness
    Bruers, Stijn
    [J]. TRANSFUSION MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2022, 36 (01) : 48 - 57
  • [45] The Cost-Effectiveness of Welfare-to-Work Programs: A Meta-Analysis
    Greenberg, David
    Cebulla, Andreas
    [J]. PUBLIC BUDGETING AND FINANCE, 2008, 28 (02): : 112 - 145
  • [46] The cost-effectiveness of isotretinoin in the treatment of acne - Part 1. A meta-analysis of effectiveness literature
    Wessels, F
    Anderson, AN
    Kropman, K
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 89 (07): : 780 - 784
  • [47] Comparison of Dosage of Glucocorticoid in Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Li, Yanhua
    Gao, Ziqing
    Zhu, Jianhong
    Su, Jianan
    Chen, Pengwei
    Li, Jiande
    Feng, Min
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [48] Cost-effectiveness analysis of antifungal treatment for patients on chemotherapy
    Nomura, K
    Kawasugi, K
    Morimoto, T
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2006, 15 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [49] Cost-effectiveness of neuroimaging technologies in management of psychiatric and insomnia disorders: A meta-analysis and prospective cost analysis
    Najafpour, Zhila
    Fatemi, Asieh
    Goudarzi, Zahra
    Goudarzi, Reza
    Shayanfard, Kamran
    Noorizadeh, Farsad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2021, 48 (05) : 348 - 358
  • [50] Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis
    不详
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2016, 20 (65) : 1 - +