Neurocentrism and Name-Calling: Let's Agree to Agree. Reply to Satel & Lilienfeld

被引：0
|
作者：
Lewis, Marc [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Toronto, Dev Psychol, 27 Kings Coll Cir, Toronto, ON M5S, Canada
来源：
NEUROETHICS | 2017年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词：
Enough fruitless debates; Levels of explanation; Neurocentrism" not; Use of "disease" nomenclature; Neurobiology doesn't mean pathology;
D O I：
10.1007/s12152-017-9325-8
中图分类号：
B82 [伦理学（道德学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
Although these authors sometimes resort to medical terminology, we strongly agree that addiction is not a disease and that the Brain Disease Model of Addiction (BDMA) captures only one part of the story and distorts the big picture. Yet Satel and Lilienfeld continue to conflate a neurobiological model (such as mine) with a disease model. They also complain that my modeling of addiction reveals a hidden "neurocentric" bias, despite my integration of multiple levels of analysis, exactly as they recommend.
引用
收藏
页码：25 / 27
页数：3
相关论文
共 50 条
12345