Adopting IS process innovations in organizations: the role of IS leaders' individual factors and technology perceptions in decision making

被引:10
|
作者
Sharma, Srinarayan [1 ]
Rai, Arun [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Kashipur, Kashipur 244713, Uttarakhand, India
[2] Georgia State Univ, J Mack Robinson Coll Business, Ctr Proc Innovat, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[3] Georgia State Univ, J Mack Robinson Coll Business, CIS Dept, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
organizational decision making; diffusion of innovation; information technology adoption; IS innovation; IS leaders; CASE; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS INNOVATION; MANAGERIAL WORK; EMPIRICAL-TEST; PERSPECTIVE; MANAGEMENT; DIFFUSION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1057/ejis.2013.24
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
While there is a rich body of literature on information system (IS) innovations, there is a limited understanding of the role IS leaders' individual factors and their appraisals of technological factors play in organizations' adoption of IS innovations. We address these gaps in the IS literature by focusing on an IS process innovation namely, computer-aided software engineering (CASE) which is targeted at the core activities of systems development/maintenance in IS departments. We specifically examine how organizations' CASE adoption decision is impacted by (1) two individual factors of IS leaders (i.e., leaders' hierarchical position and job tenure) and (2) their perceptions of technological factors (i.e., relative advantage and technological complexity of CASE). Data were gathered from IS leaders at 350 organizations in the United States using a national cross-sectional survey. The findings suggest that IS leaders' hierarchical position and their job tenure significantly differentiate CASE adopters from non-adopters. IS leaders at lower levels of the organizational hierarchy and with shorter job tenure made the adoption decisions in adopter organizations, while IS leaders at higher levels of the organizational hierarchy and with longer job tenure made the adoption decisions in non-adopter organizations. The findings also reveal that relative advantage has two dimensions namely, perceived efficacy advantage and perceived efficiency advantage and IS leaders' evaluation of the perceived efficacy advantage of CASE differentiates adopters from non-adopters. The study has important implications for our theoretical and practical understanding of the factors related to IS leaders that are influential in the organizational adoption of IS innovations.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 37
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Factors Affecting Individual and Group Decision Making in Economics
    Feherova, Martina
    [J]. EDAMBA 2018: INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE FOR DOCTORAL STUDENTS AND POST-DOCTORAL SCHOLARS: CAPACITY AND RESOURCES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: THE ROLE OF ECONOMICS, BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND RELATED DISCIPLINES, 2018, : 114 - 121
  • [32] PERCEPTIONS ON THE PHARMACISTS' ROLE IN HTA DECISION MAKING IN GREECE
    Naoum, V
    Naoum, P.
    Karampli, E.
    Athanasakis, K.
    Kyriopoulos, J.
    Pavi, E.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S805 - S805
  • [33] Decision-making approaches in process innovations: an explorative case study
    Flores-Garcia, Erik
    Bruch, Jessica
    Wiktorsson, Magnus
    Jackson, Mats
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2021, 32 (09) : 1 - 25
  • [34] The role teams and organizational factors play in disruptive innovations in ambidextrous organizations
    Nieto Cubero, Javier
    Consolacion Segura, Carolina
    [J]. 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (ICE/ITMC), 2019,
  • [35] Confidence in Dyadic Decision Making: The Role of Individual Differences
    Schuldt, Jonathon P.
    Chabris, Christopher F.
    Woolley, Anita Williams
    Hackman, J. Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2017, 30 (02) : 168 - 180
  • [36] Do Individual Preferences Affect the Environmental Decision-making Process in Teams? The Role of Participation
    de la Torre-Ruiz, Jose M.
    Alberto Aragon-Correa, J.
    Martin-Tapia, Inmaculada
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 24 (06) : 451 - 465
  • [37] Virtual team learning: The role of collaboration process and technology affordance in team decision making
    Cordes, Sean
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT & E-LEARNING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2016, 8 (04) : 602 - 627
  • [38] What factors determine the choice of public engagement undertaken by health technology assessment decision-making organizations?
    Wortley, Sally
    Street, Jackie
    Lipworth, Wendy
    Howard, Kirsten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 30 (06) : 872 - 890
  • [39] Adopting evidence-based practice in clinical decision making: nurses' perceptions, knowledge, and barriers
    Majid, Shaheen
    Foo, Schubert
    Luyt, Brendan
    Zhang, Xue
    Theng, Yin-Leng
    Chang, Yun-Ke
    Mokhtar, Intan A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2011, 99 (03) : 229 - 236
  • [40] Analysis of adopting an integrated decision making trial and evaluation laboratory on a technology acceptance model
    Lee, Yu-Cheng
    Li, Mei-Lan
    Yen, Tieh-Min
    Huang, Ting-Ho
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (02) : 1745 - 1754