Adopting IS process innovations in organizations: the role of IS leaders' individual factors and technology perceptions in decision making

被引:10
|
作者
Sharma, Srinarayan [1 ]
Rai, Arun [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Kashipur, Kashipur 244713, Uttarakhand, India
[2] Georgia State Univ, J Mack Robinson Coll Business, Ctr Proc Innovat, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[3] Georgia State Univ, J Mack Robinson Coll Business, CIS Dept, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
organizational decision making; diffusion of innovation; information technology adoption; IS innovation; IS leaders; CASE; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS INNOVATION; MANAGERIAL WORK; EMPIRICAL-TEST; PERSPECTIVE; MANAGEMENT; DIFFUSION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1057/ejis.2013.24
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
While there is a rich body of literature on information system (IS) innovations, there is a limited understanding of the role IS leaders' individual factors and their appraisals of technological factors play in organizations' adoption of IS innovations. We address these gaps in the IS literature by focusing on an IS process innovation namely, computer-aided software engineering (CASE) which is targeted at the core activities of systems development/maintenance in IS departments. We specifically examine how organizations' CASE adoption decision is impacted by (1) two individual factors of IS leaders (i.e., leaders' hierarchical position and job tenure) and (2) their perceptions of technological factors (i.e., relative advantage and technological complexity of CASE). Data were gathered from IS leaders at 350 organizations in the United States using a national cross-sectional survey. The findings suggest that IS leaders' hierarchical position and their job tenure significantly differentiate CASE adopters from non-adopters. IS leaders at lower levels of the organizational hierarchy and with shorter job tenure made the adoption decisions in adopter organizations, while IS leaders at higher levels of the organizational hierarchy and with longer job tenure made the adoption decisions in non-adopter organizations. The findings also reveal that relative advantage has two dimensions namely, perceived efficacy advantage and perceived efficiency advantage and IS leaders' evaluation of the perceived efficacy advantage of CASE differentiates adopters from non-adopters. The study has important implications for our theoretical and practical understanding of the factors related to IS leaders that are influential in the organizational adoption of IS innovations.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 37
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE ROLES OF THE INDIVIDUAL AND ORGANIZATIONS IN THE ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
    EDWARDS, RG
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1988, 3 (01) : 11 - 19
  • [2] The role of technology in the decision making process of airport development
    Petit, RG
    Bender, GG
    [J]. AIRPORT FACILITIES: INNOVATIONS FOR THE NEXT CENTURY, 1998, : 24 - 39
  • [3] The role of decision-making organizations
    JulienLaferriere, F
    [J]. EUROPE AND REFUGEES: CHALLENGE?, 1997, : 107 - 123
  • [4] Adopting and adapting: school leaders in the age of data-informed decision making
    Cornelius Young
    Gerry McNamara
    Martin Brown
    Joe O’Hara
    [J]. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2018, 30 : 133 - 158
  • [5] Adopting and adapting: school leaders in the age of data-informed decision making
    Young, Cornelius
    McNamara, Gerry
    Brown, Martin
    O'Hara, Joe
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2018, 30 (02) : 133 - 158
  • [6] Introducing a model for decision making process in organizations
    Atashpour, Hamid
    Salahshouri, Nasrin
    Samsam Shariat, Mohamad Reza
    Samavatyan, Hossein
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 126 - 126
  • [7] Determinants of the decision-making process in organizations
    Koziol-Nadolna, Katarzyna
    Beyer, Karolina
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS (KSE 2021), 2021, 192 : 2375 - 2384
  • [8] Drivers of trust in emergency organizations networks: the role of readiness, threat perceptions and participation in decision making
    Mizrahi, Shlomo
    Vigoda-Gadot, Eran
    Cohen, Nissim
    [J]. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2021, 23 (02) : 233 - 253
  • [9] Individual and situational factors influence cooperative choices in the decision-making process
    Fabio, Rosa Angela
    Romeo, Valentina
    Calabrese, Chiara
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 43 (01) : 631 - 638
  • [10] Individual and situational factors influence cooperative choices in the decision-making process
    Rosa Angela Fabio
    Valentina Romeo
    Chiara Calabrese
    [J]. Current Psychology, 2024, 43 : 631 - 638