SHOD VS. BAREFOOT EFFECTS ON FORCE AND POWER DEVELOPMENT DURING A CONVENTIONAL DEADLIFT

被引:4
|
作者
Hammer, Mark E. [1 ]
Meir, Rudi A. [1 ]
Whitting, John W. [1 ]
Crowley-McHattan, Zachary J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Cross Univ, Sch Hlth & Human Sci, Lismore, NSW, Australia
关键词
lifting technique; force production; footwear; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; MUSCLE ACTIVATION; STYLE DEADLIFTS; RESISTANCE; EXERCISES; VELOCITY; SQUAT; BODY; LOAD; STRAIGHT;
D O I
10.1519/JSC.0000000000002246
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
The kinetics of a conventional deadlift in shod (5) vs. unshod (US) footwear conditions in 10 male participants (mean +/- SD, age = 27.0 +/- 5.8 years; body mass = 78.7 +/- 11.5 kg; height = 175.8 +/- 8.2 cm; 1 repetition maximum [1 RM] deadlift = 155.8 +/- 25.8 kg) was assessed in 2 testing sessions. A counterbalanced, cross-over experimental design was used with different loads (60 and 80% 1 RM). Four sets of 4 repetitions were prescribed per session with 2 sets per shoe and with each shoe condition involving 1 set per load. Peak vertical force (PF), rate of force development (RFD), time to peak force (TPF), anterior-posterior (COP-AP) and mediolateral (COP-ML) center of pressure excursion, and barbell peak power data were recorded during all repetitions. Except for RFD (F= 6.389; p = 0.045; eta p(2) = 0.516) and MLCOP (F= 6.696; p= 0.041 ; eta p(2) = 0.527), there were no other significant main effects of shoe. There were significant main effects of load for PF (p <= 0.05), COP-AP (p = 0.011), TPF (p = 0.018), and COP-AP (p = 0.011). There were no significant interactions found between session, shoe, and load (p range from 0.944 to 0.086). Although the US condition may have produced changes in RFD and ML-COP compared with the shod condition, there is only limited evidence in the current study to support this lifting technique for the conventional deadlift. Further investigation is required to clarify any possible implications of this result and its benefit to lifters.
引用
收藏
页码:1525 / 1530
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Microstructural evolution during bending: Conventional vs. roller hemming
    Carsley, JE
    TRENDS IN MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES FOR TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRIES AND POWDER METALLURGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY, 2005, : 169 - 174
  • [22] Organic vs. conventional agriculture: knowledge, power and innovation in the food chain
    Morgan, K
    Murdoch, J
    GEOFORUM, 2000, 31 (02) : 159 - 173
  • [23] Atypical vs. Conventional antipsychotic drugs - effects on quality of life
    Golubovic, B. T.
    Drezgic-Vukic, S. A.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 23 : S160 - S160
  • [24] Strength and Power Development in Women: Individual vs. Combined Effects of Resistance and Aerobic Training
    Alemany, Joseph A.
    Welsh, Timothy T.
    Kraemer, William J.
    Spiering, Barry A.
    Hatfield, Disa L.
    Staab, Jeffery S.
    Yamamoto, Linda M.
    Evans, Rachel K.
    Sharp, Marilyn A.
    Harman, Everett A.
    Maresh, Carl M.
    Nindl, Bradley C.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2006, 38 (05): : S287 - S288
  • [25] The effects of plyometric vs. dynamic stabilization and balance training on power, balance, and landing force in female athletes
    Myer, Gregory D.
    Ford, Kevin R.
    Brent, Jensen L.
    Hewett, Timothy E.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2006, 20 (02) : 345 - 353
  • [26] Effects of organic vs. conventional farming systems on quality and antioxidant metabolism of passion fruit during maturation
    de Oliveira, Aurelice Barbosa
    de Almeida Lopes, Monica Maria
    Herbster Moura, Carlos Farley
    Oliveira, Luciana de Siqueira
    de Souza, Kellina Oliveira
    Gomes Filho, Eneas.
    Urban, Laurent
    Alcantara de Miranda, Maria Raquel
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2017, 222 : 84 - 89
  • [27] Alternatives vs. Time - Measuring the Force of Distinct Sources of Bargaining Power
    Dahlen, Niklas
    Eichstaedt, Tilman
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVE, GDN 2020, 2020, 388 : 56 - 72
  • [28] The Effect of Different pH Levels on Conventional vs. Super-force Chain Elastics
    dos Santos, Rogerio Lacerda
    Pithon, Matheus Melo
    Villela Romanos, Maria Teresa
    MATERIALS RESEARCH-IBERO-AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERIALS, 2013, 16 (01): : 246 - 251
  • [29] Open access for pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (transumbilical vs. conventional)
    Elmeligy, Hesham A. A.
    Esmat, Mohamed E.
    Elashry, Mohamed A.
    Gomaa, Amr M.
    Helmy, Ahmed H.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 39 (03): : 682 - 689
  • [30] Islamic vs. conventional banking: what about the efficiency during coronavirus?
    Bakour, Amal
    JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023,