How to approach pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant treatment: assessment of resectability using multidetector CT and tumor markers

被引:11
|
作者
Jeon, Sun Kyung [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jeong Min [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Eun Sun [3 ]
Yu, Mi Hye [4 ]
Joo, Ijin [1 ,2 ]
Yoon, Jeong Hee [1 ,2 ]
Jang, Jin-Young [5 ,6 ]
Lee, Kyoung Bun [7 ]
Lee, Sang Hyup [8 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, 101 Daehangno, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, 101 Daehangno, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[3] Chung Ang Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Konkuk Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Canc Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Pancreatic cancer; Neoadjuvant therapy; Pancreatic neoplasm; Tomography; X-ray computed; UPFRONT SURGERY; ADENOCARCINOMA; THERAPY; CHEMORADIATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; GEMCITABINE; MANAGEMENT; SURVIVAL; CA19-9;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-021-08108-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate clinical and CT factors associated with local resectability in patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy +/- radiation therapy (CRT). Methods This retrospective study included consecutive patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic cancers who underwent neoadjuvant CRT between June 2009 and June 2019. Tumor size, tumor-vascular contact with artery/vein, and local resectability categories (resectable, borderline resectable, or locally advanced) were assessed at baseline and post-CRT CT. Baseline and post-CRT carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels were also assessed. Clinical or imaging features related to R0 resection were determined using logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 179 patients (mean age, 62.4 +/- 9.3 years; 92 men) were included. After neoadjuvant CRT, 105 (58.7%) patients received R0 resection, while 74 (41.3%) did not. R0 resection rates were significantly different according to post-CRT CT resectability categories (p < 0.001): 82.8% (48/58), 70.1% (47/67), and 18.5% (10/54) for resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced disease, respectively. For post-CRT borderline resectable disease, >= 50% decrease in CA 19-9 was significantly associated with R0 resection (odds ratio (OR), 3.160; p = 0.02). For post-CRT locally advanced disease, small post-CRT tumor size <= 2 cm (OR, 9.668; p = 0.026) and decreased tumor-arterial contact (OR, 24.213; p = 0.022) were significantly associated with R0 resection. Conclusion Post-CRT CT resectability categorization may be useful for the assessment of R0 resectability in patients with pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant CRT. Additionally, >= 50% decrease in CA 19-9 was associated with R0 resection in post-CRT borderline resectable disease, while small post-CRT tumor size and decreased tumor-arterial contact were with locally advanced disease.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 66
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of Neoadjuvant Combined Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy on the CT Evaluation of Resectability and Staging in Patients with Pancreatic Head Cancer
    Kim, Yeo-Eun
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Hong, Hye-Suk
    Kang, Chang Moo
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Lim, Joon Seok
    Lee, Woo Jung
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    Kim, Ki Whang
    RADIOLOGY, 2009, 250 (03) : 758 - 765
  • [42] Predictors for resectability and survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant therapy
    Chao, Ying-Jui
    Sy, Edgar D.
    Hsu, Hui-Ping
    Shan, Yan-Shen
    BMC SURGERY, 2014, 14
  • [43] Can Resectability After Neoadjuvant Therapy Be Predicted "A Priori"? An Analysis of Pancreatic Cancer Patients Treated With Total Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and Chemoradiotherapy
    Bolm, L.
    Michelakos, T.
    Sato, H.
    Petruch, N.
    Nebbia, M.
    Qadan, M.
    Ferrone, C.
    Lillemoe, K.
    Fernandez-del Castillo, C.
    PANCREAS, 2021, 50 (07) : 1048 - 1048
  • [44] Radiographic Response of Vessel Involvement and Resectability After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Naumann, Patrick
    Ottensmeier, Friederike
    Farnia, Benjamin
    Ben-Josef, Edgar
    Liermann, Jakob
    Maier-Hein, Klaus H.
    Hackert, Thilo
    Debus, Juergen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2020, 43 (11): : 776 - 783
  • [45] Predictors for resectability and survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant therapy
    Ying-Jui Chao
    Edgar D Sy
    Hui-Ping Hsu
    Yan-Shen Shan
    BMC Surgery, 14
  • [46] Post-neoadjuvant treatment pancreatic cancer resectability and outcome prediction using CT, 18F-FDG PET/MRI and CA 19-9
    Yoo, Jeongin
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    Yu, Mi Hye
    Jang, Jin-Young
    Lee, Sang Hyub
    CANCER IMAGING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [47] How to select the most appropriate adjuvant treatment after neoadjuvant treatment and resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer?
    Rangelova, Elena
    Bratlie, Svein Olav
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 12 (05) : 2521 - 2535
  • [48] Detecting tumour response and predicting resectability after neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Barreto, Savio G.
    Loveday, Benjamin
    Windsor, John A.
    Pandanaboyana, Sanjay
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 89 (05) : 481 - 487
  • [49] Presenting Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio is Associated with Resectability After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
    Peng, June S.
    Nguyen, Trang K.
    Chalikonda, Sricharan
    Wey, Jane S.
    Walsh, R. Matthew
    Morris-Stiff, Gareth
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2015, 221 (04) : S144 - S145
  • [50] Artificial Intelligence-Based Segmentation of Residual Tumor in Histopathology of Pancreatic Cancer after Neoadjuvant Treatment
    Janssen, Boris, V
    Theijse, Rutger
    van Roessel, Stijn
    de Ruiter, Rik
    Berkel, Antonie
    Huiskens, Joost
    Busch, Olivier R.
    Wilmink, Johanna W.
    Kazemier, Geert
    Valkema, Pieter
    Farina, Arantza
    Verheij, Joanne
    de Boer, Onno J.
    Besselink, Marc G.
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (20)