Intraoral versus extraoral photobiomodulation therapy in the prevention of oral mucositis in HSCT patients: a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial

被引:8
|
作者
Ramos-Pinto, Mariana Bitu [1 ]
de Lima Gusmao, Teresa Paula [1 ]
Schmidt-Filho, Jayr [2 ]
Jaguar, Graziella Chagas [1 ]
Martins, Manoela Domingues [3 ]
Alves, Fabio Abreu [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] AC Camargo Canc Ctr, Dept Stomatol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] AC Camargo Canc Ctr, Dept Hematol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Pathol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent, Dept Stomatol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] AC Camargo Canc Ctr, Dept Estomatol, R Prof Antonio Prudente 211, BR-01509900 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
关键词
Oral mucositis; Mucositis; Side effects; Photobiomodulation; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; LEVEL LASER THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; HEAD;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-021-06228-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To compare the efficacy of intraoral and extraoral photobiomodulation (PBM) protocols for the prevention of oral mucositis (OM) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients. A total of 60 patients was randomized into intraoral PBM (IOPBM) and extraoral PBM (EOPBM) groups. Both PBM protocols were well tolerated and no side effects were observed. EOPBM session times were one fourth of IOPBM durations. Of 60 patients, 35 (58.3%) developed ulcerated OM between day +3 and day +12. No intergroup difference was observed in OM healing times (p = 0.424). The lateral border of the tongue was the most common site affected in both groups. However, the incidence of mucositis on buccal mucosa was significantly reduced in the EOPBM group (p = 0.021). Young patients (OR.5.35, 95%CI 0.94-30.4, p = 0.058) and those who had received myeloablative conditioning (OR.55.1, 95%CI 2.69-1129.3, p = 0.009) were more likely to develop ulcerated OM, whereas autologous HSCT recipients (OR 0.079, 95% CI 0.009-0.67, p = 0.021) had a lower probability of developing ulcerated OM independent of PBM protocol. EOPBM protocol was as effective as IOPBM in the management of OM in HSCT patients, with the advantage of shorter treatment sessions.
引用
收藏
页码:6495 / 6503
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children
    Lintula, H
    Kokki, H
    Vanamo, K
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (04) : 510 - 514
  • [32] Cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of juvenile fibromyalgia: A multisite, single-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial
    Kashikar-Zuck, Susmita
    Ting, Tracy V.
    Arnold, Lesley M.
    Bean, Judy
    Powers, Scott W.
    Graham, T. Brent
    Passo, Murray H.
    Schikler, Kenneth N.
    Hashkes, Philip J.
    Spalding, Steven
    Lynch-Jordan, Anne M.
    Banez, Gerard
    Richards, Margaret M.
    Lovell, Daniel J.
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2012, 64 (01): : 297 - 305
  • [33] Oral Versus Intramuscular Ondansetron for Reducing Vomiting in Children with Acute Gastroenteritis: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
    Eftekhari, Kambiz
    Mohammadpour, Sahar
    Shahgholi, Elham
    Mirzaee, Hosein Shabani
    Vigeh, Mohsen
    Taghi, Armen Malekian
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2021, 31 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [34] Effectiveness of Dry Needling versus Manual Therapy in Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorders: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Garcia-de-la-Banda-Garcia, Rocio
    Cortes-Perez, Irene
    Ibancos-Losada, Maria Del Rocio
    Lopez-Ruiz, Maria Del Carmen
    Obrero-Gaitan, Esteban
    Osuna-Perez, Maria Catalina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (09):
  • [35] Reliability and efficacy of palifermin in prevention and management of oral mucositis in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Lucchese, Alessandra
    Matarese, Giovanni
    Manuelli, Maurizio
    Ciuffreda, Claudio
    Bassani, Luca
    Isola, Gaetano
    CordaSco, Giancarlo
    Gherlone, Enrico
    [J]. MINERVA STOMATOLOGICA, 2016, 65 (01): : 43 - 53
  • [36] Comparison of the effectiveness of reboxetine versus fluoxetine in patients with atypical depression: A single-blind randomized clinical trial
    Taner, Ender
    Demir, Esra Yancar
    Cosar, Rehcet
    [J]. ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2006, 23 (06) : 974 - 987
  • [37] Comparison of the effectiveness of reboxetine versus fluoxetine in patients with atypical depression: A single-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Ender Taner
    Esra Yancar Demir
    Behcet Cosar
    [J]. Advances in Therapy, 2006, 23 : 974 - 987
  • [38] Effects of a gluten challenge in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized single-blind controlled clinical trial
    Saeede Saadati
    Amir Sadeghi
    Hamid Mohaghegh-Shalmani
    Mohammad Rostami-Nejad
    Luca Elli
    Hamid Asadzadeh-Aghdaei
    Luis Rodrigo
    Mohammad Reza Zali
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 12
  • [39] Effects of joint effusion on proprioception in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial
    Cho, Y. R.
    Hong, B. Y.
    Lim, S. H.
    Kim, H. W.
    Ko, Y. J.
    Im, S. A.
    Lee, J. I.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2011, 19 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [40] Effects of a gluten challenge in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized single-blind controlled clinical trial
    Saadati, Saeede
    Sadeghi, Amir
    Mohaghegh-Shalmani, Hamid
    Rostami-Nejad, Mohammad
    Elli, Luca
    Asadzadeh-Aghdaei, Hamid
    Rodrigo, Luis
    Zali, Mohammad Reza
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)