Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention?

被引:157
|
作者
Kunar, Melina A. [1 ]
Flusberg, Stephen
Horowitz, Todd S.
Wolfe, Jeremy M.
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Dept Psychol, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Visual Atten Lab, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
contextual cuing; attention; guidance; response selection; visual search;
D O I
10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.816
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Contextual cuing experiments show that when displays are repeated, reaction times to find a target decrease over time even when observers are not aware of the repetition. It has been thought that the context of the display guides attention to the target. The authors tested this hypothesis by comparing the effects of guidance in a standard search task with the effects of contextual cuing. First, in standard search, an improvement in guidance causes search slopes (derived from Reaction Time X Set Size functions) to decrease. In contrast, the authors found that search slopes in contextual cuing did not become more efficient over time (Experiment 1). Second, when guidance was optimal (e.g., in easy feature search), they still found a small but reliable contextual cuing effect (Experiments 2a and 2b), suggesting that other factors, such as response selection, contribute to the effect. Experiment 3 supported this hypothesis by showing that the contextual cuing effect disappeared when the authors added interference to the response selection process. Overall, the data suggest that the relationship between guidance and contextual cuing is weak and that response selection can account for part of the effect.
引用
收藏
页码:816 / 828
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does Correlated Firing Underlie Attention Deployment in Frontal Cortex?
    Esghaei, Moein
    Xue, Cheng
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 36 (06): : 1791 - 1793
  • [42] Unconscious or Underpowered? Probabilistic Cuing of Visual Attention
    Vadillo, Miguel A.
    Linssen, Douglas
    Orgaz, Cristina
    Parsons, Stephanie
    Shanks, David R.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2020, 149 (01) : 160 - 181
  • [43] An eyetracker study of the haptic cuing of visual attention
    Jones, Chanon M.
    Young, J. Jay
    Gray, Rob
    Spence, Charles
    Tan, Hong Z.
    WORLD HAPTICS 2007: SECOND JOINT EUROHAPTICS CONFERENCE AND SYMPOSIUM ON HAPTIC INTERFACES FOR VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT AND TELEOPERATOR SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 557 - +
  • [44] Response time modeling reveals multiple contextual cuing mechanisms
    Sewell, David K.
    Colagiuri, Ben
    Livesey, Evan J.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2018, 25 (05) : 1644 - 1665
  • [45] Response time modeling reveals multiple contextual cuing mechanisms
    David K. Sewell
    Ben Colagiuri
    Evan J. Livesey
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2018, 25 : 1644 - 1665
  • [46] On the relationship between the mere exposure effect and the contextual cuing effect
    Yagi, Yoshihiko
    Kikuchi, Tadashi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 482 - 482
  • [47] What is learned in spatial contextual cuing - configuration or individual locations?
    Jiang, YH
    Wagner, LC
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2004, 66 (03): : 454 - 463
  • [48] Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: Modeling contextual cuing
    Brady, Timothy F.
    Chun, Marvin M.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2007, 33 (04) : 798 - 815
  • [49] What is learned in spatial contextual cuing— configuration or individual locations?
    Yuhong Jiang
    Laura C. Wagner
    Perception & Psychophysics, 2004, 66 : 454 - 463
  • [50] Contextual cueing of pop-out visual search: When context guides the deployment of attention
    Geyer, Thomas
    Zehetleitner, Michael
    Mueller, Hermann J.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2010, 10 (05):