High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal Rhesus D genotype to guide antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin: a cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Saramago, P. [1 ]
Yang, H. [2 ]
Llewellyn, A. [3 ]
Palmer, S. [1 ]
Simmonds, M. [3 ]
Griffin, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, Exeter, Devon, England
[3] Univ York, Ctr Reviews & Disseminat, York, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
Cell-free fetal DNA; cost-effectiveness analysis; economic evaluation; non-invasive prenatal screening; rhesus; NEGATIVE PREGNANT-WOMEN; RHD;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.15152
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of high-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing (HT-NIPT) for fetalRhesus D (RhD) genotype to guide antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin compared with routine antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis (RAADP). DesignCost-effectiveness decision-analytic modelling. SettingPrimary care. ParticipantsA simulated population of 100000 RhD-negative women not known to be sensitised to the RhD antigen. MethodsA decision tree model was used to characterise the antenatal care pathway in England and the long-term consequences of sensitisation events. The diagnostic accuracy of HT-NIPT was derived from a systematic review and bivariatemeta-analysis; estimates of other inputs were derived from relevant literature sources and databases. Women in whom the HT-NIPT was positive or inconclusive continued to receive RAADP, whereas women with a negative result received none. Five alternative strategies in which the use of HT-NIPT may affect the existing postpartum care pathway were considered. Main outcome measuresCosts expressed in 2015GBP and impact on health outcomes expressed in terms of quality-adjusted life-years over a lifetime. ResultsThe results suggested that HT-NIPT appears cost saving but also less effective than current practice, irrespective of the postpartum strategy evaluated. A postpartum strategy in which inconclusive test results are distinguished from positive results performed best. HT-NIPT is only cost-effective when the overall test cost is 26.60 or less. ConclusionsHT-NIPT would reduce unnecessary treatment with routine anti-D immunoglobulin and is cost saving when compared with current practice. The extent of any savings and cost-effectiveness is sensitive to the overall test cost. Tweetable abstractHT-NIPT is cost saving compared with providing anti-D to all RhD-negative pregnant women. Tweetable abstract HT-NIPT is cost saving compared with providing anti-D to all RhD-negative pregnant women.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1414 / 1422
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping of RhD negative pregnant women for targeted anti-D therapy in Australia: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Gordon, Louisa G.
    Hyland, Catherine A.
    Hyett, Jonathan A.
    O'Brien, Helen
    Millard, Glenda
    Flower, Robert L.
    Gardener, Glenn J.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2017, 37 (12) : 1245 - 1253
  • [22] Evaluation of implementation of high-throughput Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) for foetal RHD genotype testing: results of a survey of maternity units in England, supplemented by expert elicitation findings
    Ryczek, Edyta
    White, Judith
    Carolan-Rees, Grace
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2019, 14
  • [23] The consequences of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing with cell-free foetal DNA for the detection of Down syndrome in the Spanish National Health Service: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    J. C. Bayón
    E. Orruño
    M. I. Portillo
    J. Asua
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 17
  • [24] The consequences of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing with cell-free foetal DNA for the detection of Down syndrome in the Spanish National Health Service: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Bayon, J. C.
    Orruno, E.
    Portillo, M. I.
    Asua, J.
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2019, 17 (1)