High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal Rhesus D genotype to guide antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin: a cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Saramago, P. [1 ]
Yang, H. [2 ]
Llewellyn, A. [3 ]
Palmer, S. [1 ]
Simmonds, M. [3 ]
Griffin, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, Exeter, Devon, England
[3] Univ York, Ctr Reviews & Disseminat, York, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
Cell-free fetal DNA; cost-effectiveness analysis; economic evaluation; non-invasive prenatal screening; rhesus; NEGATIVE PREGNANT-WOMEN; RHD;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.15152
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of high-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing (HT-NIPT) for fetalRhesus D (RhD) genotype to guide antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin compared with routine antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis (RAADP). DesignCost-effectiveness decision-analytic modelling. SettingPrimary care. ParticipantsA simulated population of 100000 RhD-negative women not known to be sensitised to the RhD antigen. MethodsA decision tree model was used to characterise the antenatal care pathway in England and the long-term consequences of sensitisation events. The diagnostic accuracy of HT-NIPT was derived from a systematic review and bivariatemeta-analysis; estimates of other inputs were derived from relevant literature sources and databases. Women in whom the HT-NIPT was positive or inconclusive continued to receive RAADP, whereas women with a negative result received none. Five alternative strategies in which the use of HT-NIPT may affect the existing postpartum care pathway were considered. Main outcome measuresCosts expressed in 2015GBP and impact on health outcomes expressed in terms of quality-adjusted life-years over a lifetime. ResultsThe results suggested that HT-NIPT appears cost saving but also less effective than current practice, irrespective of the postpartum strategy evaluated. A postpartum strategy in which inconclusive test results are distinguished from positive results performed best. HT-NIPT is only cost-effective when the overall test cost is 26.60 or less. ConclusionsHT-NIPT would reduce unnecessary treatment with routine anti-D immunoglobulin and is cost saving when compared with current practice. The extent of any savings and cost-effectiveness is sensitive to the overall test cost. Tweetable abstractHT-NIPT is cost saving compared with providing anti-D to all RhD-negative pregnant women. Tweetable abstract HT-NIPT is cost saving compared with providing anti-D to all RhD-negative pregnant women.
引用
收藏
页码:1414 / 1422
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF HIGH-THROUGHPUT, NON-INVASIVE PRENATAL TESTING FOR FETAL RHESUS D STATUS
    Saramago, P.
    Palmer, S.
    Griffin, S.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A588 - A588
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness of antenatal anti-D prophylaxis
    Vick, S
    Cairns, J
    Urbaniak, S
    Whitfield, C
    Raafat, A
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1996, 5 (04) : 319 - 328
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of first trimester non-invasive fetal RHD screening for targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in RhD-negative pregnant women: a model-based analysis
    Neovius, M.
    Tiblad, E.
    Westgren, M.
    Kublickas, M.
    Neovius, K.
    Wikman, A.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (08) : 1337 - 1346
  • [4] High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal rhesus D status in RhD-negative women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Huiqin
    Llewellyn, Alexis
    Walker, Ruth
    Harden, Melissa
    Saramago, Pedro
    Griffin, Susan
    Simmonds, Mark
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [5] High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal rhesus D status in RhD-negative women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huiqin Yang
    Alexis Llewellyn
    Ruth Walker
    Melissa Harden
    Pedro Saramago
    Susan Griffin
    Mark Simmonds
    [J]. BMC Medicine, 17
  • [6] First trimester non-invasive screening for fetal RHD and targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis - does it work?
    Tiblad, Eleonor
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 91 : 53 - 54
  • [7] NON-INVASIVE FETAL RHD GENOTYPING OF RHD NEGATIVE PREGNANT WOMEN FOR TARGETED ANTI-D THERAPY IN AUSTRALIA: A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    Gordon, L.
    Flower, R.
    Hyland, C.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S93 - S93
  • [8] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Down Syndrome in China
    Xu, Yan
    Wei, Yan
    Ming, Jian
    Li, Na
    Xu, Ningze
    Pong, Raymond W.
    Chen, Yingyao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2019, 35 (03) : 237 - 242
  • [9] Prenatal non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping: diagnostic accuracy of a test as a guide for appropriate administration of antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis
    Manfroi, Silvia
    Calisesi, Chiara
    Fagiani, Pietro
    Gabriele, Annalisa
    Lodi, Gianluca
    Nucci, Simonetta
    Pelliconi, Susanna
    Righini, Laura
    Randi, Vanda
    [J]. BLOOD TRANSFUSION, 2018, 16 (06) : 514 - 524
  • [10] Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21 in high-risk women: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Sutton, Amelia
    Durst, Jennifer
    Biggio, Joseph
    Harper, Lorie
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01) : S67 - S67