Rapid tendency oriented perimeter (TOP) with the Octopus visual field analyzer.

被引:0
|
作者
Lachkar, Y [1 ]
Barrault, O [1 ]
Lefrancois, A [1 ]
Demailly, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Hop St Joseph, Inst Glaucome, F-75014 Paris, France
来源
JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE | 1998年 / 21卷 / 03期
关键词
glaucoma; perimetry; TOP strategy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To study the capabilities of a new perimetric strategy with the Octopus visual field analyzer: the Tendency Oriented Perimetry. Methods Tendency oriented perimetry (TOP) attempts to assess the visual field by using answers to questions to establish threshold in the neighboring area. We evaluated 79 visual fields with the Octopus strategy using the program 32 and the TOP strategy split into the following groups: normal visual field or glaucoma suspects (52), moderately advanced glaucoma (16), advanced glaucoma (11). The following parameters were analyzed for the two strategies studied: examination time, MS (means sensitivity), MD (mean defect), LV (Loss Variance), short term fluctuation (RF) and the number of points with a deficit with different p values: p < 0.5; p < 1; p < 2; p < 5. Results TOP perimetry showed a significant reduction of exploration time: 11.87 minutes with the Octopus 32 vs 2.49 minutes with the TOP strategy (p < 0.001). There is no significant modification for the other parameters (MD, MS, RF) except for the LV (Loss Variance) for the global analysis and for each separate group. Conclusion The TOP strategy reduces examination time significantly but seems to be less accurate especially for the calculation of the depth of each scotoma in comparison with the standard Octopus 32 perimetry.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 184
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [21] Visual Field Endpoints Based on Subgroups of Points May Be Useful in Glaucoma Clinical Trials: A Study With the Humphrey Field Analyzer and Compass Perimeter
    Barkana, Yaniv
    Leshno, Ari
    Stern, Ori
    Singer, Reut
    Russ, Hermann
    Oddone, Francesco
    Lanzetta, Paolo
    Perdicchi, Andrea
    Johnson, Chris A.
    Garway-Heath, David F.
    Rossetti, Luca M.
    Skaat, Alon
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2021, 30 (08) : 661 - 665
  • [22] Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from Melbourne Rapid Fields Tablet Perimeter Software and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients
    Kumar, Harsh
    Thulasidas, Mithun
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [23] SUBCLINICAL VISUAL-FIELD DEFECTS IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS - FINDINGS WITH THE COMPUTED PERIMETER OCTOPUS AND COMPARISON WITH VISUALLY EVOKED-POTENTIALS
    MEIENBERG, O
    FLAMMER, J
    LUDIN, HP
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 57 (02): : P22 - P23
  • [24] Normal Values for the Full Visual Field, Corrected for Age- and Reaction Time, Using Semiautomated Kinetic Testing on the Octopus 900 Perimeter
    Grobbel, Julia
    Dietzsch, Janko
    Johnson, Chris A.
    Vonthein, Reinhard
    Stingl, Katarina
    Weleber, Richard G.
    Schiefer, Ulrich
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 5 (02):
  • [25] STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS OF VISUAL-FIELD WITH THE OCTOPUS 2000-R AUTOMATED PERIMETER AND PROGRAM DELTA-2000-R
    PRADINES, F
    DELBOSC, B
    ROYER, J
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 1985, 8 (8-9): : 541 - 548
  • [26] Comparison of structure-function relationship between corresponding retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and Octopus visual field cluster defect values determined by normal and tendency-oriented strategies
    Hollo, Gabor
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 101 (02) : 150 - 154
  • [27] Semi-automated kinetic perimetry: Comparison of the Octopus 900 and Humphrey visual field analyzer 3 versus Goldmann perimetry
    Bevers, Claudia
    Blanckaert, Gauthier
    Van Keer, Karel
    Fils, Jean-Francois
    Vandewalle, Evelien
    Stalmans, Ingeborg
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2019, 97 (04) : E499 - E505
  • [28] Comparison of two fast strategies for visual field assessment in glaucoma: Humphrey's SITA-fast and Octopus' TOP.
    Azuara-Blanco, A
    King, AJW
    Taguri, A
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S88 - S88