Predictors of relapse during fluoxetine continuation or maintenance treatment of major depression

被引:55
|
作者
McGrath, PJ
Stewart, JW
Petkova, E
Quitkin, FM
Amsterdam, JD
Fawcett, J
Reimherr, FW
Rosenbaum, JF
Beasley, CM
机构
[1] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, Unit 51, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Psychiat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[6] Univ Utah, Dept Psychiat, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[7] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA USA
[8] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Res Labs, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
关键词
D O I
10.4088/JCP.v61n0710
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background: The goal was to examine predictors of relapse during continuation/maintenance treatment of major depression that had remitted following 12 to 14 weeks of fluoxetine therapy. Method: The study utilizes data collected in a collaborative clinical trial including patients with DSM-III-R major depression at 5 university-affiliated outpatient psychiatry clinics. Three hundred ninety-five patients who remitted with fluoxetine therapy were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments: fluoxetine for 14 weeks followed by placebo for 36 weeks, fluoxetine for 38 weeks followed by placebo for 12 weeks, fluoxetine for 50 weeks, or placebo for 50 weeks. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify predictors of time to relapse. Results: In addition to the previously reported longitudinal pattern of response during acute treatment, neurovegetative symptom pattern was a predictor of fluoxetine benefit compared with placebo. Greater chronicity predicted poorer survival, which was not differential by treatment. The most robust advantage of fluoxetine was seen for patients with endogenous vegetative symptoms, chronic depression, and acute treatment response characterized by onset in the third week or later and persistence of response once attained. Conclusion: Both nonspecific pattern of response and neurovegetative symptoms characteristic of atypical depression were predictive of lack of fluoxerine efficacy in continuation/maintenance treatment. These findings have importance for both clinical management and analyses of future maintenance trials.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 524
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fluoxetine versus placebo in preventing relapse of major depression in children and adolescents
    Emslie, Graham J.
    Kennard, Beth D.
    Mayes, Taryn L.
    Nightingale-Teresi, Jeanne
    Carmody, Thomas
    Hughes, Carroll W.
    Rush, A. John
    Tao, Rongrong
    Rintelmann, Jeanne W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 165 (04): : 459 - 467
  • [22] A COMPARISON OF FLUOXETINE AND AMITRIPTYLINE IN THE TREATMENT OF MAJOR DEPRESSION
    KEEGAN, D
    BOWEN, RC
    BLACKSHAW, S
    SALEH, S
    DAYAL, N
    REMILLARD, F
    SHRIKHANDE, S
    PEREZ, SC
    BOULTON, A
    RICHARDSON, S
    DARCY, C
    INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 6 (02) : 117 - 124
  • [23] FLUOXETINE - AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE TRICYCLICS IN THE TREATMENT OF MAJOR DEPRESSION
    TACKE, U
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1989, 298 (02): : 126 - 129
  • [24] A comparison of fluvoxamine and fluoxetine in the treatment of major depression
    Rapaport, M
    Coccaro, E
    Sheline, Y
    Perse, T
    Holland, P
    Fabre, L
    Bradford, D
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 16 (05) : 373 - 378
  • [25] Continuation transcranial direct current stimulation for the prevention of relapse in major depression
    Martin, Donel M.
    Alonzo, Angelo
    Ho, Kerrie-Anne
    Player, Michael
    Mitchell, Philip B.
    Sachdev, Perminder
    Loo, Colleen K.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2013, 144 (03) : 274 - 278
  • [26] Fluoxetine for depression relapse prevention
    Calarge, C
    Kuperman, S
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 44 (10): : 966 - 967
  • [27] Neurophysiologic predictors of treatment response to fluoxetine in major depression (vol 85, pg 263, 1999)
    Cook, IA
    Leuchter, AF
    Witte, E
    Abrams, M
    Uijtdehaage, SHJ
    Stubbeman, W
    Rosenberg-Thompson, S
    Anderson-Hanley, C
    Dunkin, JJ
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2000, 95 (01) : 87 - 87
  • [28] Early symptomatic worsening during treatment with fluoxetine in major depression: prevalence and implications
    Cusin, C
    Perlis, RH
    Amsterdam, JD
    Quitkin, FM
    Reimherr, FW
    Zajecka, J
    Beasley, CM
    Fava, M
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 15 : S455 - S455
  • [29] Are old-old patients with major depression more likely to relapse than young-oldpatients during continuation treatment with escitalopram?
    Constantine G Lyketsos
    Emmanuelle Weiller
    Cornelius Katona
    Phillip Gorwood
    BMC Geriatrics, 11
  • [30] Executive functioning, illness course, and relapse/recurrence in continuation and maintenance treatment of late-life depression - Is there a relationship?
    Butters, MA
    Bhalla, RK
    Mulsant, BH
    Mazumdar, S
    Houck, PR
    Begley, AE
    Dew, MA
    Pollock, BG
    Nebes, RD
    Becker, JT
    Reynolds, CF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 12 (04): : 387 - 394