Predictors of relapse during fluoxetine continuation or maintenance treatment of major depression

被引:55
|
作者
McGrath, PJ
Stewart, JW
Petkova, E
Quitkin, FM
Amsterdam, JD
Fawcett, J
Reimherr, FW
Rosenbaum, JF
Beasley, CM
机构
[1] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, Unit 51, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Psychiat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[6] Univ Utah, Dept Psychiat, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[7] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA USA
[8] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Res Labs, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
关键词
D O I
10.4088/JCP.v61n0710
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background: The goal was to examine predictors of relapse during continuation/maintenance treatment of major depression that had remitted following 12 to 14 weeks of fluoxetine therapy. Method: The study utilizes data collected in a collaborative clinical trial including patients with DSM-III-R major depression at 5 university-affiliated outpatient psychiatry clinics. Three hundred ninety-five patients who remitted with fluoxetine therapy were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments: fluoxetine for 14 weeks followed by placebo for 36 weeks, fluoxetine for 38 weeks followed by placebo for 12 weeks, fluoxetine for 50 weeks, or placebo for 50 weeks. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify predictors of time to relapse. Results: In addition to the previously reported longitudinal pattern of response during acute treatment, neurovegetative symptom pattern was a predictor of fluoxetine benefit compared with placebo. Greater chronicity predicted poorer survival, which was not differential by treatment. The most robust advantage of fluoxetine was seen for patients with endogenous vegetative symptoms, chronic depression, and acute treatment response characterized by onset in the third week or later and persistence of response once attained. Conclusion: Both nonspecific pattern of response and neurovegetative symptoms characteristic of atypical depression were predictive of lack of fluoxerine efficacy in continuation/maintenance treatment. These findings have importance for both clinical management and analyses of future maintenance trials.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 524
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictors of relapse in a prospective study of fluoxetine treatment of major depression
    McGrath, Patrick J.
    Stewart, Jonathan W.
    Quitkin, Frederic M.
    Ying Chen
    Alpert, Jonathan E.
    Nierenberg, Andrew A.
    Fava, Maurizio
    Cheng, Jianfeng
    Petkova, Eva
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 163 (09): : 1542 - 1548
  • [2] INCIDENCE AND PREDICTORS OF RELAPSE DURING CONTINUATION TREATMENT OF MAJOR DEPRESSION WITH SSRI, INTERPERSONAL PSYCHOTHERAPY, OR THEIR COMBINATION
    Rucci, Paola
    Frank, Ellen
    Calugi, Simona
    Miniati, Mario
    Benvenuti, Antonella
    Wallace, Meredith
    Fagiolini, Andrea
    Maggi, Luca
    Kupfer, David J.
    Cassano, Giovanni B.
    DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2011, 28 (11) : 955 - 962
  • [3] Predictors of relapse in recurrent major depression under standardized continuation therapy
    Zimmermann, U
    Keller, F
    Ruppe, A
    Wolfersdorf, M
    Stoll, KD
    NERVENHEILKUNDE, 1997, 16 (01) : 30 - 36
  • [4] Neurophysiologic predictors of treatment response to fluoxetine in major depression
    Cook, IA
    Leuchter, AF
    Witte, E
    Abrams, M
    Uijtdehaage, SHJ
    Stubbeman, W
    Rosenberg-Thompson, S
    Anderson-Hanley, C
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 1999, 85 (03) : 263 - 273
  • [5] Residual sleep disturbance and risk of relapse during the continuation/maintenance phase treatment of major depressive disorder with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine
    Huaiyu Yang
    Lara Sinicropi-Yao
    Sarah Chuzi
    Soo Jeong Youn
    Alisabet Clain
    Lee Baer
    Ying Chen
    Patrick J McGrath
    Maurizio Fava
    George I Papakostas
    Annals of General Psychiatry, 9
  • [6] Type of residual symptom and risk of relapse during the continuation/maintenance phase treatment of major depressive disorder with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine
    Huaiyu Yang
    Sarah Chuzi
    Lara Sinicropi-Yao
    Dan Johnson
    Ying Chen
    Alisabet Clain
    Lee Baer
    Patrick J. McGrath
    Jonathan W. Stewart
    Maurizio Fava
    George I. Papakostas
    European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 2010, 260 : 145 - 150
  • [7] A CONTROLLED COMPARISON OF SERTRALINE AND FLUOXETINE IN ACUTE AND CONTINUATION TREATMENT OF MAJOR DEPRESSION
    VANMOFFAERT, M
    BARTHOLOME, F
    COSYNS, P
    DENAYER, AR
    MERTENS, C
    HUMAN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1995, 10 (05) : 393 - 405
  • [8] Type of residual symptom and risk of relapse during the continuation/maintenance phase treatment of major depressive disorder with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine
    Yang, Huaiyu
    Chuzi, Sarah
    Sinicropi-Yao, Lara
    Johnson, Dan
    Chen, Ying
    Clain, Alisabet
    Baer, Lee
    McGrath, Patrick J.
    Stewart, Jonathan W.
    Fava, Maurizio
    Papakostas, George I.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 260 (02) : 145 - 150
  • [9] Residual sleep disturbance and risk of relapse during the continuation/maintenance phase treatment of major depressive disorder with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine
    Yang, Huaiyu
    Sinicropi-Yao, Lara
    Chuzi, Sarah
    Youn, Soo Jeong
    Clain, Alisabet
    Baer, Lee
    Chen, Ying
    McGrath, Patrick J.
    Fava, Maurizio
    Papakostas, George I.
    ANNALS OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 9
  • [10] RELAPSE OF DEPRESSION DURING CONTINUATION TREATMENT - 3 CLINICAL VIGNETTES
    NASR, SJ
    GAVIRIA, M
    GRUPP, M
    RODGERS, P
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1983, 3 (01) : 32 - 34