How Analysts Think: Think-steps as a Tool for Structuring Sensemaking in Criminal Intelligence Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Selvaraj, Nallini [1 ]
Attfield, Simon [1 ]
Passmore, Peter [1 ]
Wong, William [1 ]
机构
[1] Middlesex Univ, Sch Sci & Technol, London, England
基金
欧盟第七框架计划;
关键词
sensemaking; criminal intelligence analysis; data structuring and visualisation; interaction;
D O I
10.1109/EISIC.2016.43
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Sensemaking has been described as a process involving information structuring. However, there are few detailed accounts of how this manifests in practice, particularly in relation to the creation and use of external representations such as data visualisations, and how such structuring aids sensemaking. To explore these questions in depth, we present an interview study of police crime analysts from which a model of their analysis process is developed. We describe the model focusing on the notion of 'think-steps', which for the analysts acted as a primary structuring concept. We describe how 'think-steps' propagate throughout the analysis process captured in the model. For the analysts, 'think-steps' are extensible templates that decompose a case into elements, provide a way of storing and visually structuring data, support generation of requests for information, focus research, simulate a case, and shape reporting. We reflect on the implications that our findings might have for design, including the possibility of a repertoire of evolving, sharable and reusable templates for sensemaking within a community of practice.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 75
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条