Influences on brown trout and brook trout population dynamics in a Michigan River

被引:40
|
作者
Zorn, Troy G.
Nuhfer, Andrew J.
机构
[1] Michigan Dept Nat Resources, Marquette Fisheries Res Stn, Marquette, MI 49855 USA
[2] Michigan Dept Nat Resources, Hunt Creek Fisheries Res Stn, Lewiston, MI 49756 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1577/T06-032.1
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Understanding the influences of local and regional processes on the dynamics of self-sustaining trout populations would help fishery biologists better manage trout populations and protect rivers supporting trout. We explored hypotheses behind long-term temporal variation in density, growth, and survival of brown trout Salmo trutta and brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis using data collected over several decades on Michigan's Au Sable River. Regression models developed for these species emphasized the influence of year-class strength on older age-classes, year-class strength being positively related to spawner abundance for both species and negatively related to high spring streamflow conditions for brown trout, Age-class density was also positively associated with high levels of large woody debris (LWD) in streams. Annual growth increments of brown trout and brook trout were often negatively related to increased age-class density and LWD and positively affected by elevated total phosphorus levels, cool summers, and warm winters. Annual survival of trout from age 0 to age 4 was negatively related to intra- and interspecific age-class density, and in three of seven models, positively associated with levels of LWD. Our findings emphasize the importance of year-class strength to trout population dynamics as well as the need to include collection of regional- and local-scale habitat data in studies of trout population dynamics.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 705
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hydrological drivers of brown trout population dynamics in France
    Bergerot, B.
    Cattaneo, F.
    ECOHYDROLOGY, 2017, 10 (01)
  • [22] TROUT PRODUCTION AND ANGLING SUCCESS FROM MATCHED PLANTINGS OF BROOK TROUT AND RAINBOW TROUT IN EAST FISH LAKE, MICHIGAN
    ALEXANDER, GR
    SHETTER, DS
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1969, 33 (03): : 682 - +
  • [23] Population ecology of an invasion: Effects of brook trout on native cutthroat trout
    Peterson, DP
    Fausch, KD
    White, GC
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2004, 14 (03) : 754 - 772
  • [24] Characterizing cumulative impacts using a brook trout population dynamics model
    Power, M
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1996, 90 (03) : 257 - 270
  • [25] Dynamics and regulation of the southern brook trout (Salvelinusfontinalis) population in an Appalachian stream
    Grossman, Gary D.
    Ratajczak, Robert E.
    Wagner, C. Michael
    Petty, J. Todd
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (07) : 1494 - 1508
  • [26] Do native brown trout and non-native brook trout interact reproductively?
    Cucherousset, J.
    Aymes, J. C.
    Poulet, N.
    Santoul, F.
    Cereghino, R.
    NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, 2008, 95 (07) : 647 - 654
  • [27] Partial Migration in a Robust Brown Trout Population of a Patagonian River
    O'Neal, Sarah L.
    Stanford, Jack A.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY, 2011, 140 (03) : 623 - 635
  • [28] Spatial and Temporal Dynamics in Brook Trout Density: Implications for Population Monitoring
    Wagner, Tyler
    Deweber, Jefferson T.
    Detar, Jason
    Kristine, David
    Sweka, John A.
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT, 2014, 34 (02) : 258 - 269
  • [29] Invasive brook trout disrupt the diel activity and aggregation patterns of native brown trout
    Larranaga, Nicolas
    Wallerius, Magnus L.
    Guo, Haoyu
    Cucherousset, Julien
    Johnsson, Jorgen I.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2019, 76 (07) : 1052 - 1059
  • [30] Movement, growth, and production of brown trout in sympatry with brook trout in a southern Appalachian stream
    Strange, RJ
    Phirman, RM
    Habera, JW
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTY-FOURTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE SOUTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE AGENCIES, 2000, : 146 - 156