How many response categories are sufficient for Likert type scales? An empirical study based on the Item Response Theory

被引:12
|
作者
Aybek, Eren Can [1 ]
Toraman, Cetin [2 ]
机构
[1] Pamukkale Univ, Fac Educ, Dept Educ Sci, Denizli, Turkey
[2] Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Educ, Canakkale, Turkey
关键词
Likert-type scale; Response categories; Item response theory; NUMBER; RELIABILITY; 4-POINT; 5-POINT;
D O I
10.21449/ijate.1132931
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The current study investigates the optimum number of response categories for the Likert type of scales under the item response theory (IRT). The data was collected from university students attend to mainly the faculty of medicine and the faculty of education. A form of the "Social Gender Equity Scale" developed by Gozutok et al. (2017) was prepared, which had 3, 5 and 7-point response categories. The graded response model (GRM) was used for item calibrations. The results of the study have revealed that using a 5-point response option provides advantages over using a 3-point response category in terms of reliability and test information perspective in the scale development process. The-5 point scale also provides easier responding process for the respondents while it does not pose a major disadvantage compared to a 7-point response category in the terms of reliability. Therefore, based on the findings of the study, researchers are recommended to use a 5-point response category in their scale development process.
引用
收藏
页码:534 / 547
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of number of response options on the psychometric properties of Likert-type scales used with children
    Alan, Umran
    Kabasakal, Kubra Atalay
    [J]. STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION, 2020, 66
  • [42] Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate how response styles impact measurement
    Adams, Daniel J.
    Bolt, Daniel M.
    Deng, Sien
    Smith, Stevens S.
    Baker, Timothy B.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 72 (03): : 466 - 485
  • [43] Empirical comparison of item response theory models with rater's parameters
    Uto, Masaki
    Ueno, Maomi
    [J]. HELIYON, 2018, 4 (05):
  • [44] Nonparametric item response theory for investigating dimensionality of marketing scales: A SERVQUAL application
    Paas, Leonard J.
    Sijtsma, Klaas
    [J]. MARKETING LETTERS, 2008, 19 (02) : 157 - 170
  • [45] An item response theory analysis of the Carver and White (1994) BIS/BAS Scales
    Gomez, R
    Cooper, A
    Gomez, A
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2005, 39 (06) : 1093 - 1103
  • [46] Linking Not-Quite-Vertical Scales Through Multidimensional Item Response Theory
    Hansen, Mark
    Monroe, Scott
    [J]. MEASUREMENT-INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND PERSPECTIVES, 2018, 16 (03) : 155 - 167
  • [47] Nonparametric item response theory for investigating dimensionality of marketing scales: A SERVQUAL application
    Leonard J. Paas
    Klaas Sijtsma
    [J]. Marketing Letters, 2008, 19 : 157 - 170
  • [48] How meaningful are data from Likert scales? An evaluation of how ratings are made and the role of the response shift in the socially disadvantaged
    Ogden, Jane
    Lo, Jessica
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 17 (03) : 350 - 361
  • [49] Investigating Subscores of VERA 3 German Test Based on Item Response Theory/Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models
    Temel, Gueler Yavuz
    Machunsky, Maya
    Rietz, Christian
    Okropiridze, Dimitry
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2022, 7
  • [50] FACTOR AND ITEM RESPONSE THEORY ANALYSIS OF THE PROTEAN AND BOUNDARYLESS CAREER ATTITUDE SCALES
    de Bruin, Gideon P.
    Buchner, Morne
    [J]. SA JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 36 (02)