The quality in reporting of studies determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of a patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review and a first proposal of guidelines

被引：0
|
作者：
Vanier, Antoine [1 ]
Sebille, Veronique [1 ]
Rouquette, Alexandra [2 ]
Hardouin, Jean-Benoit [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Nantes, INSERM, U1246, SPHERE, Nantes, France
[2] Univ Paris Sud 11, INSERM, CESP, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
来源：
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH | 2018年 / 27卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R19 [保健组织与事业（卫生事业管理）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
3037
引用
收藏
页码：S161 / S161
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Practical considerations for the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) determination for Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs)
    Woaye, Pascal
    Vanier, Antoine
    Pottier, Pierre
    Blanchin, Myriam
    Sebille, Veronique
    Hardouin, Jean-Benoit
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (01) : 69 - 70
  • [42] Values derived from patient reported outcomes in spine surgery: a systematic review of the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state
    Issa, Tariq Z.
    Lee, Yunsoo
    Henry, Tyler W.
    Trenchfield, Delano
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (10) : 3333 - 3351
  • [43] Values derived from patient reported outcomes in spine surgery: a systematic review of the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state
    Tariq Z. Issa
    Yunsoo Lee
    Tyler W. Henry
    Delano Trenchfield
    Gregory D. Schroeder
    Alexander R. Vaccaro
    Christopher K. Kepler
    European Spine Journal, 2023, 32 : 3333 - 3351
  • [44] Do the reported estimates of minimal clinically important difference scores amongst hiprelated patient-reported outcome measures support their use?
    Wright, Alexis
    Johnson, Jennifer
    Cook, Chad
    PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS, 2014, 19 (03) : 186 - 195
  • [45] Patient-reported outcomes for keloids: a systematic review
    Tan, Andrea
    Glass, Donald A., II
    GIORNALE ITALIANO DI DERMATOLOGIA E VENEREOLOGIA, 2019, 154 (02): : 148 - 165
  • [46] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES AND CLINICALLY IMPORTANT OUTCOME VALUES IN HIP ARTHROSCOPY A Systematic Review
    Ueland, Thomas E.
    Disantis, Ashley
    Carreira, Dominic S.
    Martin, RobRoy L.
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2021, 9 (01)
  • [47] Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation
    Hao, Qiukui
    Devji, Tahira
    Zeraatkar, Dena
    Wang, Yuting
    Qasim, Anila
    Siemieniuk, Reed A. C.
    Vandvik, Per Olav
    Lahdeoja, Tuomas
    Carrasco-Labra, Alonso
    Agoritsas, Thomas
    Guyatt, Gordon
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [48] MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE (MCID) FOR THE CROHN'S DISEASE PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS (CD-PRO/SS) TOOL
    Jacob-Moffatt, Rhian
    Galloway, Deanna
    Hassanali, Azra
    Devine, Jacob
    Sharafali, Zaineb
    Musselman, David
    Matsui, Alison
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 162 (07) : S232 - S232
  • [49] Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in recent trials in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review
    Kalyoncu, U.
    Dougados, M.
    Daures, J-P
    Gossec, L.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2009, 68 (02) : 183 - 190
  • [50] Several factors predict the achievement of the patient acceptable symptom state and minimal clinically important difference for patient-reported outcome measures following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review
    Sun, Bryan
    Vivekanantha, Prushoth
    Khalik, Hassaan Abdel
    de Sa, Darren
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2024,
12345