Hybrid Approaches and Dimensionality Reduction for Portfolio Selection with Cardinality Constraints

被引:66
|
作者
Ruiz-Torrubiano, Ruben [1 ]
Suarez, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
关键词
OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1109/MCI.2010.936308
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A novel memetic algorithm that combines evolutionary algorithms, quadratic programming, and specially devised pruning heuristics is proposed for the selection of cardinality-constrained optimal portfolios. The framework used is the standard Markowitz mean-variance formulation for portfolio optimization with constraints of practical interest, such as minimum and maximum investments per asset and/or on groups of assets. Imposing limits on the number of different assets that can be included in the investment transforms portfolio selection into an NP-complete mixed-integer quadratic optimization problem that is difficult to solve by standard methods. An implementation of the algorithm that employs a genetic algorithm with a set representation, an appropriately defined mutation operator and Random Assortment Recombination for crossover (RAR-GA) is compared with implementations using Simulated Annealing (SA) and various Estimation of Distribution Algorithms (EDAs). An empirical investigation of the performance of the portfolios selected with these different methods using financial data shows that RAR-GA and SA are superior to the implementations with EDAs in terms of both accuracy and efficiency. The use of pruning heuristics that effectively reduce the dimensionality of the problem by identifying and eliminating from the universe of investment assets that are not expected to appear in the optimal portfolio leads to significant improvements in performance and makes EDAs competitive with RAR-GA and SA.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 107
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An efficient hybrid metaheuristic algorithm for cardinality constrained portfolio optimization
    Kalayci, Can B.
    Polat, Olcay
    Akbay, Mehmet A.
    SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2020, 54
  • [42] Portfolio selection under VaR constraints
    Giannopoulos, Kostas
    Clark, Ephraim
    Tunaru, Radu
    COMPUTATIONAL MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 2 (02) : 123 - 138
  • [43] On the role of norm constraints in portfolio selection
    Gotoh J.
    Takeda A.
    Computational Management Science, 2011, 8 (4) : 323 - 353
  • [44] Routing optimization with path cardinality constraints in a hybrid SDN
    Guo, Yingya
    Luo, Huan
    Wang, Zhiliang
    Yin, Xia
    Wu, Jianping
    COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 165 : 112 - 121
  • [45] Equally weighted cardinality constrained portfolio selection via factor models
    Juan F. Monge
    Optimization Letters, 2020, 14 : 2515 - 2538
  • [46] Stable local dimensionality reduction approaches
    Hou, Chenping
    Zhang, Changshui
    Wu, Yi
    Jiao, Yuanyuan
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2009, 42 (09) : 2054 - 2066
  • [47] Portfolio Selection with Small Transaction Costs and Binding Portfolio Constraints
    Liu, Ren
    Muhle-Karbe, Johannes
    SIAM JOURNAL ON FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS, 2013, 4 (01): : 203 - 227
  • [48] Multi-period portfolio selection using kernel-based control policy with dimensionality reduction
    Takano, Yuichi
    Gotoh, Jun-ya
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2014, 41 (08) : 3901 - 3914
  • [49] CARDINALITY CONSTRAINED PORTFOLIO SELECTION PROBLEM: A COMPLETELY POSITIVE PROGRAMMING APPROACH
    Tian, Ye
    Fang, Shucherng
    Deng, Zhibin
    Jin, Qingwei
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION, 2016, 12 (03) : 1041 - 1056
  • [50] Cardinality-constrained portfolio selection based on collaborative neurodynamic optimization
    Leung, Man-Fai
    Wang, Jun
    NEURAL NETWORKS, 2022, 145 : 68 - 79