The Safety and Efficacy of Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adjacent Segment Disease in a Cohort of 44 Patients

被引:8
|
作者
Screven, Ryan [1 ]
Pressman, Elliot [1 ]
Rao, Gautam [1 ]
Freeman, Thomas B. [1 ]
Alikhani, Puya [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Neurosurg & Brain Repair, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
Adjacent segment disease; Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Minimally invasive; Revision; Spine; MAJOR VASCULAR INJURY; SPINAL-FUSION; UNITED-STATES; RISK-FACTORS; BLOOD-LOSS; SURGERY; DEGENERATION; PREVALENCE; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.046
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
-BACKGROUND: A mainstay of treatment for symptom-atic adjacent segment disease (ASD) has consisted of revision with posterior decompression and fusion. This carries significant morbidity and can be technically difficult. An alternative is stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), which may avoid complications associated with revision surgery. We describe the largest cohort of patients treated with LLIF for ASD to our knowledge. -METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on all patients who underwent transpsoas LLIF for ASD at a single academic center between 2012 and 2019. Post-operative improvement was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). -RESULTS: Forty-four patients who underwent LLIF for ASD were identified. Median age was 65 years. Median time from index surgery to ASD development was 78 months. Median levels fused via LLIF was 1. Our median follow-up was 358 days. At follow-up, the median VAS back pain score was 0 (mean, 0.884), median VAS leg pain score was 1 (mean, 0.953), and median ODI was 8. The median improvement for VAS back pain was 8, for VAS leg pain was 6, and for ODI was 40. No patients suffered new neurologic symptoms postoperatively. Of the 17 patients who initially presented with non-pain neurologic symp-toms, 8 (47.1%) experienced complete resolution of symp-toms, and 5 (29.4%) experienced only some improvement. -CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest cohort study of patients to date evaluating stand-alone LLIF for ASD. Our patient outcomes show it is safe and effective with low risk of morbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:E225 / E230
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adjacent segment disease
    Shasti, Mark
    Koenig, Scott J.
    Nash, Alysa B.
    Bahrami, Shahrzad
    Jauregui, Julio J.
    O'Hara, Nathan N.
    Jazini, Ehsan
    Gelb, Daniel E.
    Ludwig, Steven C.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (03): : 545 - 551
  • [22] Is stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion superior to instrumented lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-level, low-grade, lumbar spondylolisthesis?
    Li, Hao
    Li, Jun
    Tao, Yiqing
    Li, Fangcai
    Chen, Qixin
    Chen, Gang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 85 : 84 - 91
  • [23] Comparison of instrumented and stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jiang, Lianghai
    Liu, Lantao
    Dong, Liang
    Xu, Zhengwei
    Zhang, Xiaobo
    Qian, Lixiong
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [24] Comparison of instrumented and stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lianghai Jiang
    Lantao Liu
    Liang Dong
    Zhengwei Xu
    Xiaobo Zhang
    Lixiong Qian
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 25
  • [25] Effect of Stand-Alone Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) in Treating Lumbar Spine Lesions
    Song, Yongxing
    Wang, Haidong
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2023, 29
  • [26] Graft subsidence as a predictor of revision surgery following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Tempel, Zachary J.
    McDowell, Michael M.
    Panczykowski, David M.
    Gandhoke, Gurpreet S.
    Hamilton, D. Kojo
    Okonkwo, David O.
    Kanter, Adam S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2018, 28 (01) : 50 - 56
  • [27] When to Consider Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Is There a Role for a Comeback With New Implants?
    Menezes, Cristiano Magalhaes
    Menezes, Erica Godinho
    Asghar, Jahangir
    Guiroy, Alfredo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 16 : S69 - S75
  • [28] The Influence of Endplate Morphology on Cage Subsidence in Patients With Stand-Alone Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF)
    Hu, Ziang
    He, Dengwei
    Gao, Jiawei
    Zeng, Zhongyou
    Jiang, Chao
    Ni, Weiyu
    Yik, Jasper H. N.
    Zhao, Xing
    Fan, Shunwu
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (01) : 97 - 103
  • [29] Graft Subsidence as a Predictor of Revision Surgery Following Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Tempel, Zachary J.
    Panczykowski, David
    Zwagerman, Nathan
    Gandhoke, Gurpreet
    Hamilton, D.
    Okonkwo, David
    Kanter, Adam
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 124 (04) : A1207 - A1207
  • [30] Comments on "The Influence of Endplate Morphology on Cage Subsidence in Patients with Stand-Alone Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion"
    Zhao, Long
    Xie, Tianhang
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 12 (05) : 1031 - 1031