Near-Optimal Light Spanners

被引:11
|
作者
Chechik, Shiri [1 ]
Wulff-Nilsen, Christian [2 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Comp Sci, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Comp Sci, Univ Pk 1, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
Light spanner; APPROXIMATE DISTANCE ORACLES;
D O I
10.1145/3199607
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
A spanner H of a weighted undirected graphG is a "sparse" subgraph that approximately preserves distances between every pair of vertices in G. We refer to H as a delta-spanner of G for some parameter delta >= 1 if the distance in H between every vertex pair is at most a factor delta bigger than in G. In this case, we say that H has stretch delta. Two main measures of the sparseness of a spanner are the size (number of edges) and the total weight (the sum of weights of the edges in the spanner). It is well-known that for any positive integer k, one can efficiently construct a (2k - 1)-spanner of G with O(n(1+1/k)) edges where n is the number of vertices [2]. This size-stretch tradeoff is conjectured to be optimal based on a girth conjecture of Erdos [17]. However, the current state of the art for the second measure is not yet optimal. Recently Elkin, Neiman and Solomon [ICALP 14] presented an improved analysis of the greedy algorithm, proving that the greedy algorithm admits (2k -1) . (1 + epsilon) stretch and total edge weight of O-epsilon((k/log k) . omega(MST(G)) . n(1/k)), where omega(MST(G)) is the weight of a MST of G. The previous analysis by Chandra et al. [SOCG 92] admitted (2k - 1) . (1 + epsilon) stretch and total edge weight of O-epsilon (k omega(MST(G))n(1/k)). Hence, Elkin et al. improved the weight of the spanner by a log k factor. In this article, we completely remove the k factor from the weight, presenting a spanner with (2k - 1) . (1 + epsilon) stretch, O-epsilon (omega(MST(G))n(1/k)) total weight, and O(n(1+1/k)) edges. Up to a (1 + epsilon) factor in the stretch this matches the girth conjecture of Erdos [17].
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Near-Optimal (Euclidean) Metric Compression
    Indyk, Piotr
    Wagner, Tal
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS, 2017, : 710 - 723
  • [32] Analysis of Near-Optimal Evacuation Instructions
    Huibregtse, Olga L.
    Bliemer, Michiel C. J.
    Hoogendoorn, Serge P.
    [J]. 1ST CONFERENCE ON EVACUATION MODELING AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 3 : 189 - 203
  • [33] A CLASS OF NEAR-OPTIMAL JPDA ALGORITHMS
    ROECKER, JA
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 1994, 30 (02) : 504 - 510
  • [34] NEAR-OPTIMAL BOUNDS FOR PHASE SYNCHRONIZATION
    Zhong, Yiqiao
    Boumal, Nicolas
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 2018, 28 (02) : 989 - 1016
  • [35] Near-Optimal Auctions on Independence Systems
    Ammann, Sabrina C. L.
    Stiller, Sebastian
    [J]. THEORY OF COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2024, : 1160 - 1179
  • [36] A near-optimal mechanism for impartial selection
    Bousquet, Nicolas
    Norin, Sergey
    Vetta, Adrian
    [J]. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2014, 8877 : 133 - 146
  • [37] Near-Optimal A-B Testing
    Bhat, Nikhil
    Farias, Vivek F.
    Moallemi, Ciamac C.
    Sinha, Deeksha
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2020, 66 (10) : 4477 - 4495
  • [38] Near-Optimal Generalisations of a Theorem of Macbeath
    Mustafa, Nabil H.
    Ray, Saurabh
    [J]. 31ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (STACS 2014), 2014, 25 : 578 - 589
  • [39] Near-Optimal Interdiction of Factored MDPs
    Panda, Swetasudha
    Vorobeychik, Yevgeniy
    [J]. CONFERENCE ON UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (UAI2017), 2017,
  • [40] Near-optimal individualized treatment recommendations
    Meng, Haomiao
    Zhao, Ying-Qi
    Fu, Haoda
    Qiao, Xingye
    [J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2020, 21