Near-Optimal Light Spanners

被引:11
|
作者
Chechik, Shiri [1 ]
Wulff-Nilsen, Christian [2 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Comp Sci, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Comp Sci, Univ Pk 1, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
Light spanner; APPROXIMATE DISTANCE ORACLES;
D O I
10.1145/3199607
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
A spanner H of a weighted undirected graphG is a "sparse" subgraph that approximately preserves distances between every pair of vertices in G. We refer to H as a delta-spanner of G for some parameter delta >= 1 if the distance in H between every vertex pair is at most a factor delta bigger than in G. In this case, we say that H has stretch delta. Two main measures of the sparseness of a spanner are the size (number of edges) and the total weight (the sum of weights of the edges in the spanner). It is well-known that for any positive integer k, one can efficiently construct a (2k - 1)-spanner of G with O(n(1+1/k)) edges where n is the number of vertices [2]. This size-stretch tradeoff is conjectured to be optimal based on a girth conjecture of Erdos [17]. However, the current state of the art for the second measure is not yet optimal. Recently Elkin, Neiman and Solomon [ICALP 14] presented an improved analysis of the greedy algorithm, proving that the greedy algorithm admits (2k -1) . (1 + epsilon) stretch and total edge weight of O-epsilon((k/log k) . omega(MST(G)) . n(1/k)), where omega(MST(G)) is the weight of a MST of G. The previous analysis by Chandra et al. [SOCG 92] admitted (2k - 1) . (1 + epsilon) stretch and total edge weight of O-epsilon (k omega(MST(G))n(1/k)). Hence, Elkin et al. improved the weight of the spanner by a log k factor. In this article, we completely remove the k factor from the weight, presenting a spanner with (2k - 1) . (1 + epsilon) stretch, O-epsilon (omega(MST(G))n(1/k)) total weight, and O(n(1+1/k)) edges. Up to a (1 + epsilon) factor in the stretch this matches the girth conjecture of Erdos [17].
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Alternate Proof of Near-Optimal Light Spanners
    Bodwit, Greg
    [J]. 2024 SYMPOSIUM ON SIMPLICITY IN ALGORITHMS, SOSA, 2024, : 39 - 55
  • [2] Asymptotically Near-Optimal Planning With Probabilistic Roadmap Spanners
    Marble, James D.
    Bekris, Kostas E.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS, 2013, 29 (02) : 432 - 444
  • [3] Constant-Round Near-Optimal Spanners in Congested Clique
    Chechik, Shiri
    Zhang, Tianyi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 ACM SYMPOSIUM ON PRINCIPLES OF DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, PODC 2022, 2022, : 325 - 334
  • [4] Sparse roadmap spanners for asymptotically near-optimal motion planning
    Dobson, Andrew
    Bekris, Kostas E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 2014, 33 (01): : 18 - 47
  • [5] Near-Optimal Spanners for General Graphs in (Nearly) Linear Time
    Le, Hung
    Solomon, Shay
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 ANNUAL ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS, SODA, 2022, : 3332 - 3361
  • [6] A Near-Optimal Distributed Fully Dynamic Algorithm for Maintaining Sparse Spanners
    Elkin, Michael
    [J]. PODC'07: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON PRINCIPLES OF DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, 2007, : 185 - 194
  • [7] Extremal Distances in Directed Graphs: Tight Spanners and Near-Optimal Approximation Algorithms
    Choudhary, Keerti
    Gold, Omer
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-FIRST ANNUAL ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS (SODA'20), 2020, : 495 - 514
  • [8] Local Construction of Near-Optimal Power Spanners for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks
    Kanj, Iyad A.
    Perkovic, Ljubomir
    Xia, Ge
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING, 2009, 8 (04) : 460 - 474
  • [9] Extremal Distances in Directed Graphs: Tight Spanners and Near-Optimal Approximation Algorithms
    Choudhary, Keerti
    Gold, Omer
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS, SODA, 2020, : 495 - 514
  • [10] Near-optimal blacklisting
    Dimitrakakis, Christos
    Mitrokotsa, Aikaterini
    [J]. COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2017, 64 : 110 - 121