Jealousy, Consent, and Compersion Within Monogamous and Consensually Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships

被引:35
|
作者
Mogilski, Justin K. [1 ]
Reeve, Simon D. [1 ]
Nicolas, Sylis C. A. [1 ]
Donaldson, Sarah H. [1 ,2 ]
Mitchell, Virginia E. [1 ]
Welling, Lisa L. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oakland Univ, Dept Psychol, Pryale Hall,654 Pioneer Dr, Rochester, MI 48039 USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Dept Psychol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
Jealousy; Compersion; Consensual non-monogamy; Polyamory; Gender differences; SEX-DIFFERENCES; EMOTIONAL INFIDELITY; MATE RETENTION; ORIENTATION; EVOLUTIONARY; PSYCHOLOGY; PARTNERS; THERAPY; GENDER; COMMITMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10508-018-1286-4
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Evolutionary psychological research has studied romantic jealousy extensively within monogamous relationships, but has largely ignored jealousy among partners who mutually consent to forming extra-pair relationships (i.e., consensual non-monogamy; CNM). We examined monogamous (n = 529) and CNM (n = 159) individuals' reactions to imagining their romantic partner(s)'s extra-pair involvement. For each romantic partner, men and women completed measures of relationship jealousy and reacted to scenarios of their partner's extra-pair emotional and sexual involvement. Scenarios prompted participants to indicate which type of involvement would be more distressing and more enjoyable. They also described whether or not participants had consented to their partner's extradyadic relationship. Monogamous men were more distressed by a partner's extradyadic sexual versus emotional involvement (and a partner's emotional involvement was more enjoyable) whether the scenario was consensual or not. Monogamous women were more distressed by a partner's emotional versus sexual involvement (and a partner's sexual involvement was more enjoyable) for consensual, but not non-consensual, scenarios. There were no gender differences among CNM participants. Monogamous individuals reported greater emotional distress toward a partner's imagined extradyadic involvement, whereas CNM individuals reported thinking about their partner's extra-pair relationships more frequently. Monogamous (vs. CNM) individuals reported greater confidence that their partner would never cheat on them (i.e., enter another relationship without their consent), and CNM participants were more confident that their primary versus secondary partner would never cheat, although this effect was stronger among CNM women. Moreover, CNM participants rated that it was more important that their primary versus secondary partner did not cheat, and reported greater distress imagining that their primary versus secondary partner had cheated. Women in CNM relationships rated it more important that their partner did not cheat sexually than emotionally. Finally, we replicated previous research showing that monogamous individuals mate guard more than CNM individuals, who mate guard their primary versus secondary partner more frequently. Future directions for developing evolutionary and romantic relationship research on CNM are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1811 / 1828
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sameness and Difference in Psychological Research on Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships: The Need for Invariance and Equivalence Testing
    Sakaluk, John K.
    Quinn-Nilas, Christopher
    Fisher, Alexandra N.
    Leshner, Connor E.
    Huber, Ella
    Wood, Jessica R.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2021, 50 (04) : 1341 - 1365
  • [22] Sameness and Difference in Psychological Research on Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships: The Need for Invariance and Equivalence Testing
    John K. Sakaluk
    Christopher Quinn-Nilas
    Alexandra N. Fisher
    Connor E. Leshner
    Ella Huber
    Jessica R. Wood
    [J]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2021, 50 : 1341 - 1365
  • [23] Dimming the "Halo" Around Monogamy: Re-assessing Stigma Surrounding Consensually Non-monogamous Romantic Relationships as a Function of Personal Relationship Orientation
    Balzarini, Rhonda N.
    Shumlich, Erin J.
    Kohut, Taylor
    Campbell, Lorne
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [24] Does "Open" Rhyme with "Special"? Comparing Personality, Sexual Satisfaction, Dominance and Jealousy of Monogamous and Non-monogamous Practitioners
    Lecuona, Oscar
    Suero, Mar
    Wingen, Tobias
    de Rivas, Sara
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2021, 50 (04) : 1537 - 1549
  • [25] Does “Open” Rhyme with “Special”? Comparing Personality, Sexual Satisfaction, Dominance and Jealousy of Monogamous and Non-monogamous Practitioners
    Oscar Lecuona
    Mar Suero
    Tobias Wingen
    Sara de Rivas
    [J]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2021, 50 : 1537 - 1549
  • [26] 'It's a magnifying glass for your relationship': a thematic analysis of motivations, benefits, and challenges in consensually non-monogamous relationships
    Codrington, Rebecca
    du Plooy, Daniel R.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF FAMILY THERAPY, 2024, 45 (01) : 5 - 22
  • [27] Harmful and Helpful Therapy Practices With Consensually Non-Monogamous Clients: Toward an Inclusive Framework
    Schechinger, Heath A.
    Sakaluk, John Kitchener
    Moors, Amy C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 86 (11) : 879 - 891
  • [28] Understanding service preferences among consensually non-monogamous individuals seeking sexual healthcare
    Scoats, Ryan
    Campbell, Christine
    [J]. CULTURE HEALTH & SEXUALITY, 2024,
  • [29] COMPARISON BETWEEN MONOGAMOUS AND NON-MONOGAMOUS PEOPLE IN REGARDS TO POLYAMORY
    Faria, J.
    Finotelli Jr, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2015, 12 : 483 - 483
  • [30] Differences in Motivation to Engage in Sexual Activity Between People in Monogamous and Non-monogamous Committed Relationships
    Kelberga , Anna
    Martinsone, Baiba
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12