Jealousy, Consent, and Compersion Within Monogamous and Consensually Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships

被引:35
|
作者
Mogilski, Justin K. [1 ]
Reeve, Simon D. [1 ]
Nicolas, Sylis C. A. [1 ]
Donaldson, Sarah H. [1 ,2 ]
Mitchell, Virginia E. [1 ]
Welling, Lisa L. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oakland Univ, Dept Psychol, Pryale Hall,654 Pioneer Dr, Rochester, MI 48039 USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Dept Psychol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
Jealousy; Compersion; Consensual non-monogamy; Polyamory; Gender differences; SEX-DIFFERENCES; EMOTIONAL INFIDELITY; MATE RETENTION; ORIENTATION; EVOLUTIONARY; PSYCHOLOGY; PARTNERS; THERAPY; GENDER; COMMITMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10508-018-1286-4
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Evolutionary psychological research has studied romantic jealousy extensively within monogamous relationships, but has largely ignored jealousy among partners who mutually consent to forming extra-pair relationships (i.e., consensual non-monogamy; CNM). We examined monogamous (n = 529) and CNM (n = 159) individuals' reactions to imagining their romantic partner(s)'s extra-pair involvement. For each romantic partner, men and women completed measures of relationship jealousy and reacted to scenarios of their partner's extra-pair emotional and sexual involvement. Scenarios prompted participants to indicate which type of involvement would be more distressing and more enjoyable. They also described whether or not participants had consented to their partner's extradyadic relationship. Monogamous men were more distressed by a partner's extradyadic sexual versus emotional involvement (and a partner's emotional involvement was more enjoyable) whether the scenario was consensual or not. Monogamous women were more distressed by a partner's emotional versus sexual involvement (and a partner's sexual involvement was more enjoyable) for consensual, but not non-consensual, scenarios. There were no gender differences among CNM participants. Monogamous individuals reported greater emotional distress toward a partner's imagined extradyadic involvement, whereas CNM individuals reported thinking about their partner's extra-pair relationships more frequently. Monogamous (vs. CNM) individuals reported greater confidence that their partner would never cheat on them (i.e., enter another relationship without their consent), and CNM participants were more confident that their primary versus secondary partner would never cheat, although this effect was stronger among CNM women. Moreover, CNM participants rated that it was more important that their primary versus secondary partner did not cheat, and reported greater distress imagining that their primary versus secondary partner had cheated. Women in CNM relationships rated it more important that their partner did not cheat sexually than emotionally. Finally, we replicated previous research showing that monogamous individuals mate guard more than CNM individuals, who mate guard their primary versus secondary partner more frequently. Future directions for developing evolutionary and romantic relationship research on CNM are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1811 / 1828
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Jealousy, Consent, and Compersion Within Monogamous and Consensually Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships
    Justin K. Mogilski
    Simon D. Reeve
    Sylis C. A. Nicolas
    Sarah H. Donaldson
    Virginia E. Mitchell
    Lisa L. M. Welling
    [J]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2019, 48 : 1811 - 1828
  • [2] It is not just ‘the opposite of jealousy’: a Buddhist perspective on the emotion of compersion in consensually non-monogamous relationships
    Hin Sing Yuen
    Luu Zörlein
    Sven Walter
    [J]. Asian Journal of Philosophy, 3 (2):
  • [3] Feeling Good About Your Partners’ Relationships: Compersion in Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships
    Sharon M. Flicker
    Michelle D. Vaughan
    Lawrence S. Meyers
    [J]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2021, 50 : 1569 - 1585
  • [4] Feeling Good About Your Partners' Relationships: Compersion in Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships
    Flicker, Sharon M.
    Vaughan, Michelle D.
    Meyers, Lawrence S.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2021, 50 (04) : 1569 - 1585
  • [5] Factors that Facilitate and Hinder the Experience of Compersion Among Individuals in Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships
    Flicker, Sharon M.
    Thouin-Savard, Marie, I
    Vaughan, Michelle D.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2022, 51 (06) : 3035 - 3048
  • [6] Factors that Facilitate and Hinder the Experience of Compersion Among Individuals in Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships
    Sharon M. Flicker
    Marie I. Thouin-Savard
    Michelle D. Vaughan
    [J]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2022, 51 : 3035 - 3048
  • [7] Motivations for Engaging in Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships
    Wood, Jessica
    De Santis, Carm
    Desmarais, Serge
    Milhausen, Robin
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2021, 50 (04) : 1253 - 1272
  • [8] Sexual satisfaction among individuals in monogamous and consensually non-monogamous relationships
    Conley, Terri D.
    Piemonte, Jennifer L.
    Gusakova, Staci
    Rubin, Jennifer D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2018, 35 (04) : 509 - 531
  • [9] Motivations for Engaging in Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships
    Jessica Wood
    Carm De Santis
    Serge Desmarais
    Robin Milhausen
    [J]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2021, 50 : 1253 - 1272
  • [10] Managing Jealousy within Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships: A Critical Discursive Psychological Approach
    Korobov, Neill
    Barnes, Ava
    [J]. SOUTHERN COMMUNICATION JOURNAL, 2024, 89 (3-4) : 228 - 246