Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): The distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects

被引:511
|
作者
Swift, S [1 ]
Woodman, P
O'Boyle, A
Kahn, M
Valley, M
Bland, D
Wang, W
Schaffer, J
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Benign Gynecol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Madigan Army Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Urogynecol & Pelv Reconstruct Surg, Tacoma, WA 98431 USA
[3] Univ Texas, Med Branch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[4] Univ Texas, Med Branch, Dept Urol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[5] Univ Texas, Med Branch, Div Urol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[6] Hlth Syst Minnesota, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Shakopee, MN USA
[7] Bowman Gray Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sect Gynecol, Winston Salem, NC USA
[8] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Biometry & Epidemiol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[9] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Urogynecol & Reconstruct Pelv Surg, Dallas, TX 75230 USA
关键词
pelvic organ prolapse;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.602
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the distribution of pelvic organ support in a gynecologic clinic population to define the clinical disease state of pelvic organ prolapse and to analyze its epidemiologic condition. Study design: This was a multicenter observational study. Subjects who were seen at outpatient gynecology clinics who required an annual gynecologic examination underwent a pelvic organ prolapse quantification examination and completed a prolapse symptom questionnaire. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to define pelvic organ prolapse with the use of symptoms and pelvic organ prolapse quantification examination measures. Standard age-adjusted univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate various relationships. Results: The population consisted of 1004 women who were aged 18 to 83 years. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse quantification stages was 24% (stage 0), 38% (stage 1), 35% (stage 2), and 2% (stage 3). The definition of pelvic organ prolapse that was determined by the receiver operator characteristic curve was the leading edge of their vaginal wall that was -0.5 cm above the hymenal remnants. Multivariate analysis revealed age, Hispanic race, increasing body mass index, and the increasing weight of the vaginally delivered fetus as risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse, as defined in this population. Conclusion: The results from this Population suggest that there is a bell-shaped distribution of pelvic organ support in a gynecologic clinic population. Advancing age, Hispanic race, increasing body mass index, and the increasing weight of the vaginally delivered fetus have the strongest correlations with prolapse. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 806
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Failure of Pelvic Organ Support in Mice Deficient In Fibulin-3
    Rahn, David D.
    Acevedo, Jesus F.
    Roshanravan, Shayzreen
    Keller, Patrick W.
    Davis, Elaine C.
    Marmorstein, Lihua Y.
    Word, R. Ann
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2009, 174 (01): : 206 - 215
  • [42] Successful use of ring pessary with support for advanced pelvic organ prolapse
    Ding, Jing
    Chen, Chun
    Song, Xiao-chen
    Zhang, Lei
    Deng, Mou
    Zhu, Lan
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 26 (10) : 1517 - 1523
  • [43] Apical support at the time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse: A comparison of approaches
    Fairchild, P. S.
    Kamdar, N. S.
    Rosen, E.
    Swenson, C. W.
    Morgan, D. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (04) : S482 - S482
  • [44] The Recovery of Pelvic Organ Support during the First Year Postpartum.
    Chen, Yi
    Lin, Xiaohua
    Chen, Jingjing
    Chen, Cong
    Guess, Marsha
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2013, 20 (S3) : 335A - 335A
  • [45] IS PELVIC ORGAN SUPPORT DIFFERENT BETWEEN YOUNG NULLIPAROUS AFRICANS AND CAUCASIANS?
    Shek, K. L.
    Wong, V
    Krause, H.
    Goh, J.
    Dietz, H. P.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2013, 32 (06) : 608 - 610
  • [46] Influence of Mode of Delivery on Pelvic Organ Support 6 Months Postpartum
    Diez-Itza, I.
    Arrue, M.
    Ibanez, L.
    Paredes, J.
    Murgiondo, A.
    Sarasqueta, C.
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2011, 72 (02) : 123 - 129
  • [47] Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Pelvic Organ Support During Pregnancy EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Staer-Jensen, Jette
    Siafarikas, Franziska
    Hilde, Gunvor
    Bo, Kari
    Engh, Marie Ellstrom
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2013, 68 (11) : 735 - 736
  • [48] Successful use of ring pessary with support for advanced pelvic organ prolapse
    Jing Ding
    Chun Chen
    Xiao-chen Song
    Lei Zhang
    Mou Deng
    Lan Zhu
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2015, 26 : 1517 - 1523
  • [49] A SELF-RETAINING SUPPORT DEVICE FOR THE TREATMENT OF PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
    Cervigni, M.
    Padoa, A.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 26 : S171 - S172
  • [50] Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Systems in Clinical Staging of Iranian Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Ghanbari, Zinat
    Peivandi, Saloumeh
    Pasikhani, Maryam Deldar
    Darabi, Foroohar
    ETHIOPIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 30 (06) : 921 - 928