Contribution of the tricellular tight junction to paracellular permeability in leaky and tight epithelia

被引:30
|
作者
Krug, Susanne M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Inst Clin Physiol, Berlin, Germany
关键词
tricellular tight junction; ion permeability; transepithelial resistance; macromolecule permeability; leaky epithelia; tight epithelia; tricellulin; OCCLUDIN; BARRIER; CLAUDIN-2; PROTEIN; IDENTIFICATION; LOCALIZATION; EXPRESSION; MARVELD3; CONTACTS; FORMS;
D O I
10.1111/nyas.13379
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The tricellular tight junction (tTJ) is a potential weak point of the paracellular barrier. For solving the proportional contribution of the tTJ, ion conductances and macromolecule permeabilities were analyzed in cell lines of different leakiness. MDCK II, Caco-2, and HT-29/B6 cells were subjected to two-path impedance spectroscopy and morphological analyses in order to calculate the contribution of the tTJ to paracellular and total ion conductivity. The contribution to macromolecule permeability was evaluated by tricellulin overexpression or knockdown. Tricellulin-dependent macromolecule passage was comparably regulated in leaky and tight epithelia, but relative and absolute ion permeabilities of the tTJs were different. Assuming a minimal (50 pS) and maximal (146 pS) conductivity per single tTJ, the possible range of contribution of the tTJ to paracellular ion conductance amounted to only 0.3-1.1% in the leaky cell line MDCK II, but 3-25% in the moderately tight cell line Caco-2, and not less than 29% in the tight cell line HT-29/B6. In these cells, this resulted in a contribution to total epithelial conductance of 9-32%. In conclusion, in leaky epithelia the bicellular TJ accounts for nearly the entire paracellular ion conductance, whereas in tight epithelia the low bicellular TJ conductance has large impact on the tTJ.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 230
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Increased tyrosine phosphorylation causes redistribution of adherens junction and tight junction proteins and perturbs paracellular barrier function in MDCK epithelia
    Collares-Buzato, CB
    Jepson, MA
    Simmons, NL
    Hirst, BH
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1998, 76 (02) : 85 - 92
  • [32] Rho kinase regulates tight junction function and is necessary for tight junction assembly in polarized intestinal epithelia
    Walsh, SV
    Hopkins, AM
    Chen, J
    Narumiya, S
    Parkos, CA
    Nusrat, A
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 121 (03) : 566 - 579
  • [33] Claudins and the modulation of tight junction permeability
    Guenzel, D.
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA, 2017, 219 : 7 - 7
  • [34] CLAUDINS AND THE MODULATION OF TIGHT JUNCTION PERMEABILITY
    Guenzel, Dorothee
    Yu, Alan S. L.
    PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2013, 93 (02) : 525 - 569
  • [35] Calcium regulation of tight junction permeability
    Bleich, Markus
    Shan, Qixian
    Himmerkus, Nina
    BARRIERS AND CHANNELS FORMED BY TIGHT JUNCTION PROTEINS II, 2012, 1258 : 93 - 99
  • [36] FRACTURE FACES OF ZONULAE OCCLUDENTES FROM TIGHT AND LEAKY EPITHELIA
    CLAUDE, P
    GOODENOUGH, DA
    JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1973, 58 (02): : 390 - 400
  • [37] Inducible expression of Snail selectively increases paracellular ion permeability and differentially modulates tight junction proteins
    Carrozzino, F
    Soulié, P
    Huber, D
    Mensi, N
    Orci, L
    Cano, A
    Féraille, E
    Montesano, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 289 (04): : C1002 - C1014
  • [38] TIGHT JUNCTIONS AND THE MOLECULAR-BASIS FOR REGULATION OF PARACELLULAR PERMEABILITY
    ANDERSON, JM
    VANITALLIE, CM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER PHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 269 (04): : G467 - G475
  • [39] CLAUDIN TIGHT JUNCTION PROTEINS: NOVEL ASPECTS IN PARACELLULAR TRANSPORT
    Will, Constanze
    Fromm, Michael
    Mueller, Dominik
    PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 28 (06): : 577 - 584
  • [40] Paracellular drug absorption enhancement through tight junction modulation
    Lemmer, Hendrik J. R.
    Hamman, Josias H.
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY, 2013, 10 (01) : 103 - 114