Implementation of Artificial Intelligence for Classification of Frogs in Bioacoustics

被引:6
|
作者
Chao, Kuo-Wei [1 ]
Hu, Nian-Ze [2 ,3 ]
Chao, Yi-Chu [4 ]
Su, Chin-Kai [4 ]
Chiu, Wei-Hang [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Tainan 701, Taiwan
[2] Natl Formosa Univ, Smart Machinery & Intelligent Mfg Res Ctr, Huwei Township 632, Yunlin, Taiwan
[3] Natl Formosa Univ, Dept Informat Management, Huwei Township 632, Yunlin, Taiwan
[4] Fudan Senior High Sch, Taoyuan 324, Taiwan
来源
SYMMETRY-BASEL | 2019年 / 11卷 / 12期
关键词
artificial intelligence (AI); feedforward neural network approach (FNNA); symmetry; Mel-scale frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC); machine learning (ML); graphics processing unit (GPU); support vector machine (SVM); bioacoustics; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.3390/sym11121454
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This research presents the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) for classification of frogs in symmetry of the bioacoustics spectral by using the feedforward neural network approach (FNNA) and support vector machine (SVM). Recently, the symmetry concept has been applied in physics, and in mathematics to help make mathematical models tractable to achieve the best learning performance. Owing to the symmetry of the bioacoustics spectral, feature extraction can be achieved by integrating the techniques of Mel-scale frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) and mentioned machine learning algorithms, such as SVM, neural network, and so on. At the beginning, the raw data information for our experiment is taken from a website which collects many kinds of frog sounds. This in fact saves us collecting the raw data by using a digital signal processing technique. The generally proposed system detects bioacoustic features by using the microphone sensor to record the sounds of different frogs. The data acquisition system uses an embedded controller and a dynamic signal module for making high-accuracy measurements. With regard to bioacoustic features, they are filtered through the MFCC algorithm. As the filtering process is finished, all values from ceptrum signals are collected to form the datasets. For classification and identification of frogs, we adopt the multi-layer FNNA algorithm in machine learning and the results are compared with those obtained by the SVM method at the same time. Additionally, two optimizer functions in neural network include: scaled conjugate gradient (SCG) and gradient descent adaptive learning rate (GDA). Both optimization methods are used to evaluate the classification results from the feature datasets in model training. Also, calculation results from the general central processing unit (CPU) and Nvidia graphics processing unit (GPU) processors are evaluated and discussed. The effectiveness of the experimental system on the filtered feature datasets is classified by using the FNNA and the SVM scheme. The expected experimental results of the identification with respect to different symmetry bioacoustic features of fifteen frogs are obtained and finally distinguished.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial intelligence classification methods of atrial fibrillation with implementation technology
    Lim, Huey Woan
    Hau, Yuan Wen
    Lim, Chiao Wen
    Othman, Mohd Afzan
    [J]. COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2016, 21 : 155 - 162
  • [2] A review of implementation of Artificial Intelligence systems for weld defect classification
    Vishal, V.
    Ramya, R.
    Srinivas, P. Vinay
    Samsingh, R. Vimal
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2019, 16 : 579 - 583
  • [3] Implementation of a Fruit Quality Classification Application Using an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm
    Chen, Ming-Chih
    Cheng, Yin-Ting
    Liu, Chun-Yu
    [J]. SENSORS AND MATERIALS, 2022, 34 (01) : 151 - 162
  • [4] Artificial Intelligence and the Implementation Challenge
    Shaw, James
    Rudzicz, Frank
    Jamieson, Trevor
    Goldfarb, Avi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (07)
  • [5] Artificial intelligence implementation in ESWL
    Fenner A.
    [J]. Nature Reviews Urology, 2021, 18 (6) : 322 - 322
  • [6] Regulatory and Implementation Considerations for Artificial Intelligence
    Chen, Si
    Lobo, Brian C.
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 57 (05) : 871 - 886
  • [7] Artificial intelligence in oncology: Path to implementation
    Chua, Isaac S.
    Gaziel-Yablowitz, Michal
    Korach, Zfania T.
    Kehl, Kenneth L.
    Levitan, Nathan A.
    Arriaga, Yull E.
    Jackson, Gretchen P.
    Bates, David W.
    Hassett, Michael
    [J]. CANCER MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (12): : 4138 - 4149
  • [8] Artificial intelligence implementation in pancreaticobiliary endoscopy
    Low, Daniel J.
    Hong, Zhuoqiao
    Lee, Jeffrey H.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 16 (06) : 493 - 498
  • [9] Lung sounds classification with artificial intelligence
    Sourour, A.
    Karray, M. M.
    Gargouri, R.
    Ben Salah, I.
    Feki, W.
    Triki, Z.
    Bahloul, N.
    Kallel, N.
    Khemakhem, R.
    Moussa, N.
    Hentati, A.
    Kammoun, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60
  • [10] Artificial intelligence and counseling: Four levels of implementation
    Fulmer, Russell
    [J]. THEORY & PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 29 (06) : 807 - 819