Water footprint comparison of a naphtha-fired combined cycle power plant and a coal-fired steam power plant

被引:0
|
作者
Arpit, Sankalp [1 ]
Das, Prasanta Kumar [2 ]
Dash, Sukanta Kumar [2 ]
机构
[1] IIT Kharagpur, Sch Energy Sci & Engn, Kharagpur, W Bengal, India
[2] IIT Kharagpur, Dept Mech Engn, Kharagpur, W Bengal, India
关键词
Coal; Direct water footprint; Water footprint; Water mass balance; Indirect water footprint;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-022-10079-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The vulnerability of the power generation industries vulnerability to the availability of water is widespread and growing. In this regard, water footprint (WF) is one method to assess this challenge. The present study conducts the WF of a naphtha-fired combined cycle power plant (CCPP) and a coal-fired steam power plant (CSPP). For carrying out WF, it is prudent to look after water consumption during operations and the supply chain stages. Hence, in this regard, two methods have been adopted to investigate the WF of both power plants. The first method deals with the water balance mass diagram (direct WF), and the second method deals with the water supply chain (indirect WF). Evaporation loss appears to be a significant contributing factor to the direct WF. On the other hand, operational WF seems to be an essential contributing factor to indirect WF. Furthermore, the result also shows that specific water consumption in CSPP is 3.54 m(3)/h, whereas, in CCPP, it is 0.9 m(3)/h. Finally, some methods have also been suggested to reduce WF in both power plants.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Coal-fired power plant to bury issue of emissions
    Hoag, H
    [J]. NATURE, 2003, 422 (6927) : 7 - 7
  • [42] Radionuclide emissions from a coal-fired power plant
    Amin, Y. M.
    Khandaker, Mayeen Uddin
    Shyen, A. K. S.
    Mahat, R. H.
    Nor, R. M.
    Bradley, D. A.
    [J]. APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2013, 80 : 109 - 116
  • [43] Exergetic and thermoeconomic analyses of a coal-fired power plant
    Uysal, Cuneyt
    Kurt, Huseyin
    Kwak, Ho-Young
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES, 2017, 117 : 106 - 120
  • [44] Risk assessment of explosion in coal-fired power plant
    Lebecki, K.
    Rosmus, P.
    [J]. SAFETY AND RELIABILITY FOR MANAGING RISK, VOLS 1-3, 2006, : 2185 - +
  • [45] Materials for ultrasupercritical coal-fired power plant boilers
    Viswanathan, R
    Henry, JF
    Tanzosh, J
    Stanko, G
    Shingledecker, J
    Vitalis, B
    [J]. BALTICA VI: LIFE MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE FOR POWER PLANTS, VOL 1 AND 2, 2004, 233-234 : 97 - 113
  • [46] Robustified optimal control of a coal-fired power plant
    Simon, E.
    Stoica, C.
    Rodriguez-Ayerbe, P.
    Dumur, D.
    Wertz, V.
    [J]. 2010 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, 2010, : 1217 - 1222
  • [47] West Virginia coal-fired power plant planned
    不详
    [J]. MINING ENGINEERING, 2001, 53 (08) : 13 - 13
  • [48] Hybrid photovoltaic/solar chimney power plant combined with agriculture: The transformation of a decommissioned coal-fired power plant
    Xie, Mingxi
    Jia, Teng
    Dai, Yanjun
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 191 : 1 - 16
  • [49] Optimization and analysis of combined heat and water production system based on a coal-fired power plant
    Yang, Xiaolin
    Liu, Zhaoyang
    Xia, Jianjun
    [J]. ENERGY, 2023, 262
  • [50] Thermoeconomic analysis of a coal-fired power plant combined with district heating and cooling
    Ziher, Dejan
    Poredos, Alojz
    [J]. ECOS 2006: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EFFICIENCY, COST, OPTIMIZATION, SIMULATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF ENERGY SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-3, 2006, : 1261 - +