Assessment of positive surgical margins in the management of patients after radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Saier, E. [1 ]
Pinar, U. [2 ]
De la Taille, A. [3 ]
Irani, J. [4 ]
Salomon, L. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Argenteuil, Serv Urol, F-95107 Argenteuil, France
[2] Sorbonne Univ, Hop Pitie Salpetriere Hop, AP HP, Serv Urol, F-75013 Paris, France
[3] Hop Univ Henri Mondor, Hop Henri Mondor, AP HP, Serv Urol, F-94010 Creteil, France
[4] Univ Paris Saclay, Hop Bicetre, AP HP, Serv Urol, F-94270 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[5] Ctr Hosp Mt de Marsan, Mt De Marsan, France
来源
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE | 2022年 / 32卷 / 05期
关键词
Localized prostate cancer; Surgical margins; Biochemical recurrence; Adjuvant radiotherapy; Radical prostatectomy; EARLY SALVAGE RADIOTHERAPY; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY; INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; SURVIVAL; RISK; IMPROVES; OUTCOMES; ANTIGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.purol.2022.01.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction. - Few data are available regarding positive surgical margins (PSM) in patients who underwent surgery for localized prostate cancer (PC). Our objective was to evaluate the impact of PSM on biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) for patients who underwent PC for pT2 tumor without adjuvant treatment.Methods. - We included each patient who underwent radical prostatectomy for pT2N0 PC between 1988 and 2018. Primary endpoint was biochemical recurrence (BR). BRFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine factors associated with BR and PSM.Results. - Overall, 2429 patients were included whom 420 patients had PSM (17.3%). Median follow-up was 116 months. BRFS at 10 years was 66.6% in case of PSM, and 84% in the negative margins group (P < 0.0001). Parameters associated with BR were preoperative PSA level (P < 0.0001), Gleason score (P < 0.0001), tumor volume in biopsies, and margins length (P < 0.04).Conclusion. - PSM in pT2N0 CP are associated with poor prognosis in terms of BR. Nevertheless, only a small number of pT2R1 cancer will present biological recurrence. The use of adjuvant radiotherapy in these patients therefore represents a risk of overtreatment, with the risk of adverse effects inherent to irradiation. Clinical and biological monitoring in case of PSM seems acceptable.(c) 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 362
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk of Biochemical Recurrence and Positive Surgical Margins in Patients With pT2 Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
    Roder, Martin Andreas
    Thomsen, Frederik Birkebaek
    Berg, Kasper Drimer
    Christensen, Ib Jarle
    Brasso, Klaus
    Vainer, Ben
    Iversen, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 109 (02) : 132 - 138
  • [2] Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer
    Oh, Jong Jin
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Choe, Gheeyoung
    Lee, Sang Bun
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (05) : 595 - 600
  • [3] PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AMONG PT2 AND PT3A PROSTATE CANCER
    Oh, Jong Jin
    Lee, Byung Ki
    Joo, Young Min
    Lee, Sangchul
    Jeong, Chang Wool
    Jung, Seong Jin
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Park, Dong Soo
    Byun, Seok-soo
    Lee, Sang Eun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E81 - E81
  • [4] Variation in Positive Surgical Margin Status After Radical Prostatectomy for pT2 Prostate Cancer
    Tan, Wei Shen
    Krimphove, Marieke J.
    Cole, Alexander P.
    Marchese, Maya
    Berg, Sebastian
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Loeppenberg, Bjoern
    Nabi, Junaid
    Abdollah, Firas
    Choueiri, Toni K.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    [J]. CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2019, 17 (05) : E1060 - E1068
  • [5] Radical prostatectomy. Prognostic value of positive surgical margins in pT2 patients
    Algarra, Ruben
    Zudaire, Javier
    Tienza, Antonio
    Maria Velis, Jose
    Merino, Imanol
    Barba, Javier
    Tolosa, Egoitz
    Rincon, Anibal
    Enrique Robles, Jose
    Pascual, Ignacio
    [J]. ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2013, 66 (08): : 796 - 806
  • [6] Non-apical positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer is associated with the highest risk of recurrence
    Roder, Martin Andreas
    Kawa, Sandra
    Scheike, Thomas
    Toft, Birgitte Gronkaer
    Hansen, Jacob Bjerg
    Brasso, Klaus
    Vainer, Ben
    Iversen, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 109 (08) : 818 - 822
  • [7] Does the location of pt2 positive surgical margins influence the risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer?
    Roder, M. Andreas
    Kawa, Sandra
    Scheike, Thomas
    Toft, Birgitte G.
    Hansen, Jakob B.
    Brasso, Klaus
    Vainer, Ben
    Iversen, Peter
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 47 : 50 - 50
  • [8] THE IMPACT OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ON BIOCHEMICAL RELAPSE IN PATIENTS WITH PT2 AND PT3 DISEASE
    Schiavina, R.
    Franceschelli, A.
    Brunocilla, E.
    Concetti, S.
    Manferrari, F.
    Bertaccini, A.
    Garofalo, M.
    Borghesi, M.
    Vagnoni, V.
    Baccos, A.
    Rocca, C.
    Pultrone, C.
    Martorana, G.
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 30 (04) : 1479 - 1480
  • [9] VARIATION IN POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN STATUS FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PT2 PROSTATE CANCER
    Tan, Wei Shen
    Krimphove, Marieke
    Cole, Alexander
    Berg, Sebastian
    Marchese, Maya
    Lipsitz, Stuart
    Loppenberg, Bjon
    Nabi, Junaid
    Abdollah, Firas
    Choueiri, Toni
    Kibel, Adam
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E959 - E959
  • [10] Positive Margins in pT2 Prostate Cancer in Open, Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
    Troncoso, P.
    Matin, S.
    Babaian, R. J.
    Pettaway, C. A.
    Pisters, L. L.
    Prokhorova, I.
    Davis, J. W.
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2010, 90 : 222A - 223A