Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer

被引:10
|
作者
Oh, Jong Jin [1 ]
Hong, Sung Kyu [1 ]
Byun, Seok-Soo [1 ]
Choe, Gheeyoung [2 ]
Lee, Sang Bun [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Urol, Songnam, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Pathol, Songnam, South Korea
关键词
Prostate; Prostatic neoplasms; Prostatectomy; Surgical margins; EXTRAPROSTATIC EXTENSION; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; CAPSULAR INCISION; DISEASE; PROGRESSION; IMPACT; ADENOCARCINOMA; PREDICTOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.05.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the prognostic significance of positive surgical margins (PSM)s among patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer. Patients and methods: We reviewed the records of 658 patients who were revealed to have pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer after undergoing RP without neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. For our analysis, patients were subgrouped as the following: group 1: 406 (61.7%) with negative surgical margins (NSM)s and no extracapsular extension of tumor (BCE); group 2: 99 (15.0%) with PSMs and no ECE; group 3: 63 (9.6%) with NSMs and BCE; and group 4: 90 (13.7%) with PSMs and BCE. The effects of various variables on biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival were assessed via uni- and multivariate analyses. Results: During median follow-up of 36 months, group 1 had significantly higher BCR-free survival compared with the other 3 groups (P < 0.001). However, no significant differences in BCR-free survivals were observed among the group 2, 3, and 4 (all P > 0.05). In multivariate analysis, PSM (P = 0.009) was observed to be significantly associated with BCR-free survival among groups 1 and 2 combined. Among groups 3 and 4, pathologic Gleason score (P = 0.002), but not PSM (P = 0.668), was the only significant predictor for BCR-free survival in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: According to our results, PSM is significantly associated with biochemical outcome after RP in pT2 prostate cancer. Meanwhile, patients with pT2 tumor and PSM appear to have comparable biochemical outcome compared with those with stage pT3a tumor independent of their marginal status. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 600
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AMONG PT2 AND PT3A PROSTATE CANCER
    Oh, Jong Jin
    Lee, Byung Ki
    Joo, Young Min
    Lee, Sangchul
    Jeong, Chang Wool
    Jung, Seong Jin
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Park, Dong Soo
    Byun, Seok-soo
    Lee, Sang Eun
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E81 - E81
  • [2] Assessment of positive surgical margins in the management of patients after radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer
    Saier, E.
    Pinar, U.
    De la Taille, A.
    Irani, J.
    Salomon, L.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2022, 32 (05): : 354 - 362
  • [3] POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER MINIMALLY-INVASIVE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN PT2 AND PT3A POPULATION COULD BE CONSIDERED AS PATHOLOGICAL UPSTAGING
    Salas, Rafael Ernesto Sanchez
    Ouzzane, Adil
    Rozet, Francois
    Valero, Rair
    Encinas, Miguel Sanchez
    Miranda, Natalia
    Galiano, Marc
    Barret, Eric
    Prapotnich, Dominique
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A225 - A225
  • [4] Positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with pT2 and pT3a disease could be considered pathological upstaging
    Ouzzane, Adil
    Rozet, Francois
    Salas, Rafael Sanchez
    Galiano, Marc
    Barret, Eric
    Prapotnich, Dominique
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 (04) : 586 - 591
  • [5] Positive surgical margins after minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy in pT2 and pT3a population could be considered as pathological upstaging
    Ouzzane, A.
    Rozet, F.
    Sanchez-Salas, R. E.
    Valero, R.
    Encinas, Sanchez M.
    Miranda, N.
    Galiano, M.
    Barret, E.
    Prapotnich, D.
    Cathelineau, X.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E877 - U847
  • [6] Radical prostatectomy. Prognostic value of positive surgical margins in pT2 patients
    Algarra, Ruben
    Zudaire, Javier
    Tienza, Antonio
    Maria Velis, Jose
    Merino, Imanol
    Barba, Javier
    Tolosa, Egoitz
    Rincon, Anibal
    Enrique Robles, Jose
    Pascual, Ignacio
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2013, 66 (08): : 796 - 806
  • [7] PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Schiavina, R.
    Birgatti, F.
    Guidi, M.
    Pernetti, R.
    Salama, A.
    Zukerman, Z.
    Diazzi, D.
    Borghesi, M.
    Vagnoni, V.
    Rocca, C.
    Manferrari, F.
    Concetti, S.
    Brunocilla, E.
    Bertaccini, A.
    Martorana, G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (02) : 283 - 283
  • [8] PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Martorana, Giuseppe
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Vici, Alexia
    Marini, Manola
    Zukerman, Ziv
    Diazzi, Davide
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Concetti, Sergio
    Bertaccini, Alessandro
    Garofalo, Marco
    Brunocilla, Eugenio
    Manferrari, Fabio
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 31 (05) : 1949 - 1950
  • [9] Variation in Positive Surgical Margin Status After Radical Prostatectomy for pT2 Prostate Cancer
    Tan, Wei Shen
    Krimphove, Marieke J.
    Cole, Alexander P.
    Marchese, Maya
    Berg, Sebastian
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Loeppenberg, Bjoern
    Nabi, Junaid
    Abdollah, Firas
    Choueiri, Toni K.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2019, 17 (05) : E1060 - E1068
  • [10] Risk of Biochemical Recurrence and Positive Surgical Margins in Patients With pT2 Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
    Roder, Martin Andreas
    Thomsen, Frederik Birkebaek
    Berg, Kasper Drimer
    Christensen, Ib Jarle
    Brasso, Klaus
    Vainer, Ben
    Iversen, Peter
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 109 (02) : 132 - 138