Can the optimal cervical length for placing ultrasound-indicated cerclage be identified?

被引:11
|
作者
Szychowski, J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Owen, J. [2 ]
Hankins, G. [3 ]
Iams, J. D. [4 ]
Sheffield, J. S. [5 ]
Perez-Delboy, A. [6 ]
Berghella, V. [7 ]
Wing, D. A. [8 ]
Guzman, E. R. [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Biostat, RPHB 327,1720 2nd Ave South, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Dallas, TX USA
[6] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New York, NY USA
[7] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[8] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Orange, CA 92668 USA
[9] St Peters Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
关键词
cerclage; cervical length; preterm birth prediction; vaginal sonography; PRETERM DELIVERY; HIGH-RISK; PREVENTION; WOMEN; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1002/uog.15674
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To assess a continuum of cervical length (CL) cut-offs for the efficacy of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in women with previous spontaneous preterm birth (PTB). Methods This was a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of ultrasound-indicated cerclage for the prevention of PTB in high-risk women. The efficacy of cerclage for preventing recurrent PTB < 35, < 32 and < 24 weeks' gestation was assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) and CIs were estimated for a range of CL cut-offs using bootstrap regression. The 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of bootstrapped ORs determined the CIs. Results were illustrated using smoothed curves superimposed on estimated ORs by CL cut-off. Results Of 301 women with a CL < 25 mm, 142 underwent ultrasound-indicated cerclage and 159 did not have cerclage placement. The few cases with CL < 10mm limited the evaluation to CL cut-offs between < 10mm and < 25 mm. For PTB < 35 weeks, ORs in women with a cerclage and CL < 25mm were statistically significantly lower than in those without cerclage, and efficacy was maintained at smaller CL cut-offs. Results were similar for PTB < 32 weeks. For PTB < 24 weeks, results differed, with ORs increasing toward unity (no benefit), with wide CIs, for CL cut-offs between < 10mm and < 15 mm, attributed to the small number of births < 24 weeks. Conclusions The efficacy of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in women with previous spontaneous PTB varies by action point CL cut-off and by PTB gestational age of interest. Cerclage significantly reduces the risk of PTB < 35 and < 32 weeks, at CL cut-offs between < 10mm and < 25 mm, with the greatest reduction at shorter CL, affirming that women with prior spontaneous PTB and a short CL are appropriate candidates for ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Copyright (C) 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 47
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes after Exam-Indicated Cerclage and Ultrasound-Indicated Cerclage in Triplet Gestations.
    Tabsh, Kareem K.
    Gaw, Stephanie L.
    Tabsh, Khalil M. A.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2018, 25 : 193A - 193A
  • [32] Association between post-randomization sonographic cervical length and birth gestational age in a multicenter trial of ultrasound-indicated cerclage
    Owen, John
    Szychowski, Jeff
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) : S197 - S197
  • [33] Does type of suture affect ultrasound-indicated cerclage efficacy?
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Szychowski, Jeff
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 : S213 - S213
  • [34] Indications for and pregnancy outcomes of cervical cerclage: 11-year comparison of patients undergoing history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated, or rescue cerclage
    Chan, Lucia L. K.
    Leung, T. W.
    Lo, T. K.
    Lau, W. L.
    Leung, W. C.
    [J]. HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 21 (04) : 310 - 317
  • [36] Ultrasound-Indicated and Rescue Cervical Cerclage and Immediate Pregnancy Outcomes: A Retrospective Observational Study.
    Andrews, V.
    Meritahti, M.
    Thomas, S.
    Yulia, Angela
    Wales, N.
    Terzidou, V.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2017, 24 : 183A - 183A
  • [37] Time from elective removal of ultrasound-indicated cerclage to birth
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Szychowski, Jeff
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 : S82 - S82
  • [38] The use of ultrasound-indicated cerclage or cervical pessary in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with a short cervix at midgestation
    Fichera, Anna
    Prefumo, Federico
    Mazzoni, Giorgia
    Molinaris, Valentina
    Zanardini, Cristina
    Fratelli, Nicola
    Frusca, Tiziana
    Sartori, Enrico
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (04) : 487 - 493
  • [39] Elective cerclage vs. ultrasound-indicated cerclage in high-risk pregnancies
    To, MS
    Palaniappan, V
    Skentou, C
    Gibb, D
    Nicolaides, KH
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 19 (05) : 475 - 477
  • [40] Cerclage height correlates with risk of preterm delivery in patients with ultrasound-indicated but not prophylactic cerclage
    Heo, Hye
    Gebb, Juliana
    Rosner, Mara
    Einstein, Francine
    Merkatz, Irwin R.
    Dar, Pe'er
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 : S143 - S143