Can the optimal cervical length for placing ultrasound-indicated cerclage be identified?

被引:11
|
作者
Szychowski, J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Owen, J. [2 ]
Hankins, G. [3 ]
Iams, J. D. [4 ]
Sheffield, J. S. [5 ]
Perez-Delboy, A. [6 ]
Berghella, V. [7 ]
Wing, D. A. [8 ]
Guzman, E. R. [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Biostat, RPHB 327,1720 2nd Ave South, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Texas Med Branch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Dallas, TX USA
[6] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New York, NY USA
[7] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[8] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Orange, CA 92668 USA
[9] St Peters Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
关键词
cerclage; cervical length; preterm birth prediction; vaginal sonography; PRETERM DELIVERY; HIGH-RISK; PREVENTION; WOMEN; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1002/uog.15674
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To assess a continuum of cervical length (CL) cut-offs for the efficacy of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in women with previous spontaneous preterm birth (PTB). Methods This was a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of ultrasound-indicated cerclage for the prevention of PTB in high-risk women. The efficacy of cerclage for preventing recurrent PTB < 35, < 32 and < 24 weeks' gestation was assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) and CIs were estimated for a range of CL cut-offs using bootstrap regression. The 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of bootstrapped ORs determined the CIs. Results were illustrated using smoothed curves superimposed on estimated ORs by CL cut-off. Results Of 301 women with a CL < 25 mm, 142 underwent ultrasound-indicated cerclage and 159 did not have cerclage placement. The few cases with CL < 10mm limited the evaluation to CL cut-offs between < 10mm and < 25 mm. For PTB < 35 weeks, ORs in women with a cerclage and CL < 25mm were statistically significantly lower than in those without cerclage, and efficacy was maintained at smaller CL cut-offs. Results were similar for PTB < 32 weeks. For PTB < 24 weeks, results differed, with ORs increasing toward unity (no benefit), with wide CIs, for CL cut-offs between < 10mm and < 15 mm, attributed to the small number of births < 24 weeks. Conclusions The efficacy of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in women with previous spontaneous PTB varies by action point CL cut-off and by PTB gestational age of interest. Cerclage significantly reduces the risk of PTB < 35 and < 32 weeks, at CL cut-offs between < 10mm and < 25 mm, with the greatest reduction at shorter CL, affirming that women with prior spontaneous PTB and a short CL are appropriate candidates for ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Copyright (C) 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 47
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can the optimal cervical length for placing ultrasound-indicated cerclage be identified?
    Owen, John
    Szychowski, Jeff
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 : S198 - S199
  • [2] Outcomes of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies with a short cervical length
    Wu, Fang-Tzu
    Chen, Ying-Yu
    Chen, Chie-Pein
    Sun, Fang-Ju
    Chen, Chen-Yu
    [J]. TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 59 (04): : 508 - 513
  • [3] Prior Ultrasound-Indicated Cerclage Comparison of Cervical Length Screening or History-Indicated Cerclage in the Next Pregnancy
    Suhag, Anju
    Reina, Jordana
    Sanapo, Laura
    Martinelli, Pasquale
    Saccone, Gabriele
    Simonazzi, Giuliana
    Giraldo-Isaza, Maria
    Potti, Sushma
    Hoffman, Matthew K.
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (05): : 962 - 968
  • [4] Ultrasound-indicated cerclage: Does the actual cervical length or gestational age matter?
    Bigelow, Catherine A.
    Naqvi, Mariam
    Namath, Amalia G.
    Ali, Munira
    Fox, Nathan S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S319 - S319
  • [5] Cervical length measurement after ultrasound-indicated cerclage associated with time to delivery
    Shumard, Kristina
    Farmer, Kaci
    Nitsche, Joshua F.
    Quinn, Kristen
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (01) : S378 - S378
  • [6] Ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage: Outcome depends on preoperative cervical length and presence of visible membranes at time of cerclage
    Groom, KM
    Shennan, AH
    Bennett, PR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (02) : 445 - 449
  • [7] Perioperative complications of history-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage
    Drassinower, Daphnie
    Poggi, Sarah H.
    Landy, Helain J.
    Gilo, Noridelle
    Benson, James E.
    Ghidini, Alessandro
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 205 (01) : 53.e1 - 53.e5
  • [8] Cervical stroma and length at ultrasound-indicated cerclage and prediction of preterm delivery: a cohort study
    Gomez, Luis M.
    Alawneh, Maysarah
    Nasrallah, Sebastian
    Seif, Karl
    Jackson, Araba
    Rodriguez, Marcella
    Awosika, Olubukunola
    Khoury, Alfred
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S552 - S552
  • [9] Neonatal morbidities in a multicenter randomized trial of ultrasound-indicated cerclage for shortened cervical length (CL)
    Owen, John
    Szychowski, Jeff
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 : S17 - S18
  • [10] Cervical funneling: effect on gestational length and ultrasound-indicated cerclage in high-risk women
    Mancuso, Melissa
    Szychowski, Jeff
    Owen, John
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) : S23 - S23