Analysing sustainability certification systems in the German housing sector from a theory of social institutions

被引:10
|
作者
Rid, Wolfgang [1 ,2 ]
Lammers, Joerg [3 ]
Zimmermann, Simona [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Urban Planning & Design, Res Grp City Mobil Energy, Keplerstr 11, D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Erfurt Univ Appl Sci, Fac Architecture & Urban Planning, Urban & Reg Econ, Schlulterstr 1, D-99089 Erfurt, Germany
[3] Fed Off Bldg & Reg Planning, Fed Inst Res Bldg Urban Affairs & Spatial Dev, Div 2 7 Energy Optimized Bldg,Str 17 Juni 112, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Urban Planning & Design, Keplerstr 11, D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
Sustainable housing; Sustainability indicators; Certification systems; Institutions of sustainability; Housing survey; LEED; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.022
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Sustainable residential buildings and a sustainable housing development ('sustainable housing') are key factors in the sustainability strategy of the German government. Certification systems have been developed to assess sustainable housing and to better inform stakeholders and hence improve sustainability in the housing sector. Currently, however, a variety of different certification systems exists to assess sustainable housing using different sets of indicators. The supply of different certification systems to measure the same ('sustainability') raises questions of validity of the assessment instruments. Also, different stakeholders hold different interests with regard to sustainability certification systems, which leads to investigate the legitimacy of certification systems. In this study, we applied the theory of social institutions to investigate legitimacy of sustainability certification in the housing sector. To find out about the validity of sustainability measurement, this article presents a survey where real estate stakeholders were asked to evaluate indicators applied by different sustainability certification systems. Results showed high heterogeneity of tastes towards indicators of sustainable housing. Results also identified potential 'areas of conflicts' where stakeholders differed most widely in the evaluation of indicators. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 110
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条