Setting global research priorities for child protection in humanitarian action: Results from an adapted CHNRI exercise

被引:4
|
作者
Bermudez, Laura Gauer [1 ]
Williamson, Katharine [2 ]
Stark, Lindsay [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Sch Social Work, New York, NY USA
[2] Save Children, London, England
[3] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat & Family Hlth, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] Washington Univ, George Warren Brown Sch Social Work, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 08期
关键词
CONDITIONAL CASH TRANSFERS; YOUNG-CHILDREN; HEALTH; IMPACT; EMERGENCIES; VIOLENCE; DELPHI; TRENDS; INCOME; LABOR;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0202570
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Armed conflict, natural disaster, and forced displacement affect millions of children each year. Such humanitarian crises increase the risk of family separation, erode existing support networks, and often result in economic loss, increasing children's vulnerability to violence, exploitation, neglect, and abuse. Research is needed to understand these risks and vulnerabilities and guide donor investment towards the most effective interventions for improving the well-being of children in humanitarian contexts. Methods The Assessment, Measurement & Evidence (AME) Working Group of the Alliance for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (ACPHA) identified experts to participate in a research priority setting exercise adapted from the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI). Experts individually identified key areas for research investment which were subsequently ranked by participants using a Likert scale. Research Priority Scores (RPS) and Average Expert Agreement (AEA) were calculated for each identified research topic, the top fifteen of which are presented within this paper. Results Intervention research, which aims to rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of standard child protection activities in humanitarian settings, ranked highly. Child labor was a key area of sector research with two of the top ten priorities examining the practice. Respondents also prioritized research efforts to understand how best to bridge humanitarian and development efforts for child protection as well as identifying most effective way to build the capacity of local systems in order to sustain child protection gains after a crisis. Conclusions Rigorous, scientific research that assesses the scope of child protection risks, examines the effectiveness of interventions to improve child well-being, and translates evidence to practice is critical. Findings from this research priority setting exercise offer guidance for a global research agenda on child protection in humanitarian settings, encouraging cooperation among donors, implementers, and academics to pursue a coordinated approach to evidence generation.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SETTING PRIORITIES IN MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH: RESULTS FROM THE ROAMER STUDY
    Luciano, M.
    Del Vecchio, V.
    Sampogna, G.
    Obradors-Tarragu, C.
    Fiorillo, A.
    Maj, M.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 29
  • [22] Setting Research Priorities to Reduce Global Mortality from Childhood Pneumonia by 2015
    Rudan, Igor
    El Arifeen, Shams
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
    Black, Robert E.
    Brooks, Abdullah
    Chan, Kit Yee
    Chopra, Mickey
    Duke, Trevor
    Marsh, David
    Pio, Antonio
    Simoes, Eric A. F.
    Tamburlini, Giorgio
    Theodoratou, Evropi
    Weber, Martin W.
    Whitney, Cynthia G.
    Campbell, Harry
    Qazi, Shamim A.
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (09)
  • [23] Research priorities to reduce the impact of musculoskeletal disorders: a priority setting exercise with the child health and nutrition research initiative method
    Paskins, Zoe
    Farmer, Clare E.
    Manning, Fay
    Andersson, David A.
    Barlow, Tim
    Bishop, Felicity L.
    Brown, Christopher A.
    Clark, Amanda
    Clark, Emma M.
    Dulake, Debra
    Gulati, Malvika
    Le Maitre, Christine L.
    Jones, Richard K.
    Loughlin, John
    Mason, Deborah J.
    McCarron, Maura
    Millar, Neil L.
    Pandit, Hemant
    Peat, George
    Richardson, Stephen M.
    Salt, Emma J.
    Taylor, E. Jane
    Troeberg, Linda
    Wilcox, Ruth K.
    Wise, Elspeth
    Wilkinson, Colin
    Watt, Fiona E.
    LANCET RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 4 (09): : E635 - E645
  • [24] Setting Research Priorities To Reduce Global Mortality from Childhood Diarrhoea by 2015
    Fontaine, Olivier
    Kosek, Margaret
    Bhatnagar, Shinjini
    Boschi-Pinto, Cynthia
    Chan, Kit Yee
    Duggan, Christopher
    Martinez, Homero
    Ribeiro, Hugo
    Rollins, Nigel C.
    Salam, Mohammed A.
    Santosham, Mathuram
    Snyder, John D.
    Tsai, Alexander C.
    Vargas, Beth
    Rudan, Igor
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2009, 6 (03) : 0246 - 0251
  • [25] Research Priorities for Coastal Geoscience and Engineering: A Collaborative Exercise in Priority Setting From Australia
    Power, Hannah E.
    Pomeroy, Andrew W. M.
    Kinsela, Michael A.
    Murray, Thomas P.
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [26] GLOBAL DRIVERS SETTING DESERTIFICATION RESEARCH PRIORITIES: INSIGHTS FROM A STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION FORUM
    Bisaro, Alexander
    Kirk, Michael
    Zdruli, Pandi
    Zimmermann, Willi
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 25 (01) : 5 - 16
  • [27] Global action plan for childhood diarrhoea: Developing research priorities Report from a Workshop of the Programme for Global Paediatric Research
    Zipursky, Alvin
    Wazny, Kerri
    Black, Robert
    Keenan, William
    Duggan, Christopher
    Olness, Karen
    Simon, Jonathan
    Simpson, Evan
    Sherman, Philip
    Santosham, Mathuram
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2013, 3 (01)
  • [28] The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise
    Catrin Tudur Smith
    Helen Hickey
    Mike Clarke
    Jane Blazeby
    Paula Williamson
    Trials, 15
  • [29] Global research priorities for COVID-19 in maternal, reproductive and child health: Results of an international survey
    Etti, Melanie
    Alger, Jackeline
    Salas, Sofia P.
    Saggers, Robin
    Ramdin, Tanusha
    Endler, Margit
    Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
    Alfven, Tobias
    Ahmed, Yusuf
    Callejas, Allison
    Eskenazi, Deborah
    Khalil, Asma
    Le Doare, Kirsty
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (09):
  • [30] The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise
    Smith, Catrin Tudur
    Hickey, Helen
    Clarke, Mike
    Blazeby, Jane
    Williamson, Paula
    TRIALS, 2014, 15