A qualitative model structure sensitivity analysis method to support model selection

被引:13
|
作者
Van Hoey, S. [1 ,2 ]
Seuntjens, P. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
van der Kwast, J. [5 ]
Nopens, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, BIOMATH, Dept Math Modelling Stat & Bioinformat, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Flemish Inst Technol Res VITO, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Dept Soil Management, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[4] Univ Antwerp, Dept Bioengn, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
[5] UNESCO IHE Inst Water Educ, NL-2601 Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Model structure evaluation; Hydrology; Flexible model building; Morris screening; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; CATCHMENT; CALIBRATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.052
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The selection and identification of a suitable hydrological model structure is a more challenging task than fitting parameters of a fixed model structure to reproduce a measured hydrograph. The suitable model structure is highly dependent on various criteria, i.e. the modeling objective, the characteristics and the scale of the system under investigation and the available data. Flexible environments for model building are available, but need to be assisted by proper diagnostic tools for model structure selection. This paper introduces a qualitative method for model component sensitivity analysis. Traditionally, model sensitivity is evaluated for model parameters. In this paper, the concept is translated into an evaluation of model structure sensitivity. Similarly to the one-factor-at-a-time (OAT) methods for parameter sensitivity, this method varies the model structure components one at a time and evaluates the change in sensitivity towards the output variables. As such, the effect of model component variations can be evaluated towards different objective functions or output variables. The methodology is presented for a simple lumped hydrological model environment, introducing different possible model building variations. By comparing the effect of changes in model structure for different model objectives, model selection can be better evaluated. Based on the presented component sensitivity analysis of a case study, some suggestions with regard to model selection are formulated for the system under study: (1) a non-linear storage component is recommended, since it ensures more sensitive (identifiable) parameters for this component and less parameter interaction; (2) interflow is mainly important for the low flow criteria; (3) excess infiltration process is most influencing when focussing on the lower flows; (4) a more simple routing component is advisable; and (5) baseflow parameters have in general low sensitivity values, except for the low flow criteria. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3426 / 3435
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Model selection for support vector machines
    Chapelle, O
    Vapnik, V
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 12, 2000, 12 : 230 - 236
  • [32] Sensitivity analysis for volcanic source modeling quality assessment and model selection
    Cannavo, Flavio
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2012, 44 : 52 - 59
  • [33] Sample selection based on sensitivity analysis in parameterized model order reduction
    Soll, Tino
    Pulch, Roland
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2017, 316 : 369 - 379
  • [34] Developing a selection model for media agencies using the AHP and sensitivity analysis
    Hsu, Pi-Fang
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICS & MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2011, 14 (01): : 123 - 139
  • [35] Sensitivity of Spring Phenology Simulations to the Selection of Model Structure and Driving Meteorological Data
    David, Reka Agnes
    Barcza, Zoltan
    Kern, Aniko
    Kristof, Erzsebet
    Hollos, Roland
    Kis, Anna
    Lukac, Martin
    Fodor, Nandor
    ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (08)
  • [36] Sobol's sensitivity analysis for a fuel cell stack assembly model with the aid of structure-selection techniques
    Zhang, Wei
    Cho, Chongdu
    Piao, Changhao
    Choi, Hojoon
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2016, 301 : 1 - 10
  • [37] Parameter identification and qualitative sensitivity analysis of hysteretic model by Particle Swarm Optimization
    Peng, J. Y.
    Li, H.
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING AND INTELLIGENT INFRASTRUCTURE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 1009 - 1014
  • [38] A DECISION SUPPORT MODEL FOR THE SELECTION OF BEST VALUE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROCUREMENT METHOD
    Perera, Srinath
    Karunasena, Gayani
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 13 : 224 - 243
  • [39] Support vector machine based optimal model selection method in anomaly detection
    Zhang X.-Q.
    Gu C.-H.
    Wu J.-Y.
    Dianzi Keji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2011, 40 (04): : 559 - 563
  • [40] Model Structure Selection - An Update
    Hjalmarsson, Hakan
    Rojas, Cristian R.
    2014 EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ECC), 2014, : 2382 - 2385