Adding regional analgesia to general anaesthesia: increase of risk or improved outcome?

被引:24
|
作者
Curatolo, Michele [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bern, Dept Anaesthesiol & Pain Therapy, Inselspital, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
anaesthesia; analgesia; cancer; complications; epidural; morbidity; mortality; pain; postoperative; regional; PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; TERM POSTTHORACOTOMY PAIN; EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CARDIAC-SURGERY; DOUBLE-BLIND; BLOCK;
D O I
10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833963c8
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Although it is clear that regional analgesia in association with general anaesthesia substantially reduces postoperative pain, the benefits in terms of overall perioperative outcome are less evident. The aim of this nonsystematic review was to evaluate the effect on middle and long-term postoperative outcomes of adding regional perioperative analgesia to general anaesthesia. This study is based mostly on systematic reviews, large epidemiological studies and large or high-quality randomized controlled trials that were selected and evaluated by the author. The endpoints that are discussed are perioperative morbidity, cancer recurrence, chronic postoperative pain, postoperative rehabilitation and risk of neurologic damage. Epidural analgesia may have a favourable but very small effect on perioperative morbidity. The influence of other regional anaesthetic techniques on perioperative morbidity is unclear. Preliminary data suggest that regional analgesia might reduce the incidence of cancer recurrence. However, adequately powered randomized controlled trials are lacking. The sparse literature available suggests that regional analgesia may prevent the development of chronic postoperative pain. Rehabilitation in the immediate postoperative period is possibly improved, but the advantages in the long term remain unclear. Permanent neurological damage is extremely rare. In conclusion, while the risk of permanent neurologic damage remains extremely low, evidence suggests that regional analgesia may improve relevant outcomes in the long term. The effect size is mostly small or the number-needed-to-treat is high. However, considering the importance of the outcomes of interest, even minor improvement probably has substantial clinical relevance. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:586-591
引用
下载
收藏
页码:586 / 591
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Anaesthesia in cattle: regional and local analgesia
    Jones, RS
    IRISH VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1997, 50 (12) : 734 - 740
  • [12] Thoracic epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome
    Van Aken, H.
    SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 14 (01) : 19 - 20
  • [13] Apparatus for obtaining general analgesia and anaesthesia
    Marrett, HR
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1942, 1942 : 643 - 643
  • [14] PORTABLE EQUIPMENT FOR GENERAL ANAESTHESIA, GENERAL ANALGESIA, AND RESUSCITATION
    HEWER, CL
    LANCET, 1961, 2 (721): : 1290 - &
  • [15] Regional anaesthesia -: before or after general anaesthesia?
    Grüning, T
    ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (01) : 86 - 87
  • [16] Regional anaesthesia - before or after general anaesthesia?
    Fischer, HBJ
    ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 53 (08) : 727 - 729
  • [17] History of analgesia and regional anaesthesia through philately
    Rangappa, P.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2008, 36 : 12 - 18
  • [18] Corticosteroids in regional anaesthesia and analgesia - state of the art
    Lejcko, J.
    Gabrhelik, T.
    ANESTEZIOLOGIE A INTENZIVNI MEDICINA, 2018, 29 (03): : 151 - 157
  • [19] Regional anaesthesia and perioperative outcome
    Tziavrangos, Evangelos
    Schug, Stephan A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 19 (05) : 521 - 525
  • [20] Perioperative ischaemia in aortic surgery: Combined epidural/general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia vs general anaesthesia and iv analgesia
    Garnett, RL
    MacIntyre, A
    Lindsay, P
    Barber, GG
    Cole, CW
    Hajjar, G
    McPhail, NV
    Ruddy, TD
    Stark, R
    Boisvert, D
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1996, 43 (08): : 769 - 777